Re: did the uverse

Article View: chi.internet

Article #487

#487

From: Cydrome Leader
Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 19:05

23 lines
2149 bytes

Robert Bonomi <bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com> wrote:
> In article <jnnb2s$q46$2@reader1.panix.com>,
> Cydrome Leader  <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> wrote:
>>Geoff Gass <glg@tanzenmb.com> wrote:
>>> Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> wrote:
>>>> I just noticed that my charges for service are $29 something, not $32 
>>>> something, which it mentions over and over again.
>>>>
>>>> I have no idea why this is.
>>> 
>>> 32 = 29 + taxes/fees/some other phone company BS?
>>
>>there's no taxes on data only circuits.
> 
> In Illinois there is a 15%(!!) 'telecommunications tax' on all data circuits.
> City of Chicago also taxes data circuits.
> 
> *Many* providers bundle those in their base charge, and don't bother to
> itemize it separately, but the gov't -does- get it's bite of your pocketbook.

if that's there it's bundled.

If AT&T is fucking over the city, I'm all for that too.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <jo96dd$t5u$2@reader1.panix.com>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!pr3ni15402pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed.news.ucla.edu!usenet.stanford.edu!panix!panix.com!presence

References:

<jlvp1o$ds3$1@reader1.panix.com> <jnic96$rl9$2@reader1.panix.com> <slrnjprtra.eea.glg@ftupet.ftupet.com> <jnnb2s$q46$2@reader1.panix.com> <v9ednQz5fdzmnDXSnZ2dnUVZ_uKdnZ2d@posted.nuvoxcommunications>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 10d5fa,b610e7b1d82c1e2c
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gid837b0c45a0,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.223.40 with SMTP id qr8mr14008025pbc.0.1336417517872;
        Mon, 07 May 2012 12:05:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!pr3ni15402pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed.news.ucla.edu!usenet.stanford.edu!panix!panix.com!presence
From: Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com>
Newsgroups: chi.internet
Subject: Re: did the uverse
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 19:05:17 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <jo96dd$t5u$2@reader1.panix.com>
References: <jlvp1o$ds3$1@reader1.panix.com> <jnic96$rl9$2@reader1.panix.com> <slrnjprtra.eea.glg@ftupet.ftupet.com> <jnnb2s$q46$2@reader1.panix.com> <v9ednQz5fdzmnDXSnZ2dnUVZ_uKdnZ2d@posted.nuvoxcommunications>
NNTP-Posting-Host: panix1.panix.com
X-Trace: reader1.panix.com 1336417517 29886 166.84.1.1 (7 May 2012 19:05:17 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@panix.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 19:05:17 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: tin/1.8.3-20070201 ("Scotasay") (UNIX) (NetBSD/5.1.2 (i386))

Reply to Parent Message