🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: chi.internet
Article #503

Re: why the push for DSL->Uverse

#503
From: Cydrome Leader
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 02:24
51 lines
3441 bytes
dye <dye@adsl-64-108-195-217.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net> wrote:
> Recently, I had my DSL Elite bill go up to 43 dollars, and in calls to
> customer billing and finally customer retention, both of them
> tried to get me to switch to Uverse, which surprised me since Uverse
> isn't in Park Ridge (TV Uverse, at least - WOW and Comcrap are the
> only companies w/the franchise in PR.)
> 
> I wondered why they are pushing for this transition and remembered
> others here wondering the same thing.
> 
> (as an aside, they dropped me down $10 for a year, but that is still
> 8 bucks more than I was previously paying)
> 
> I got my phone line repaired (&%$%^#@%@^@Y#$ ATT customer service
> procedure) for static and dial tone drops (as well as horrible DSL
> outages/syncrates), and after the very competent tech fixed
> the problem, I asked him to investigate a DSL slowdown (the repaired
> line synced back at 6+, but I was only getting 2.7 down.  After 
> removing everything but his laptop, and getting the same datarate
> he was leery of my Westell Tri-Link modem.  I dragged the still-in-
> plastic-bag-piece-of-garbage Siemens/Efficient out, hooked it up,
> and got the same results.
> 
> At this point I asked him about Uverse in Park Ridge.  He said
> it would not be true uverse, but a new kind of customer location
> modem and central office DSLAM that used something other than ATM
> for data transfer.  This uses only a single pair of wires, not
> 2 pairs as "real" Uverse has, so no bandwidth for video.

I forgot to tear open the bad uverse modem to see if it had 2 or 4 wires. 
I've heard about the two pair stuff, but it's vague.

> I forgot to ask him if my voice sevice would be analog over the
> single pair, or converted to VOIP on the modem.
> 
> Oh yeah, he did mention one thing that is probably a big reason
> for AT&Ts push to U-verse everything:  The techs who install and service
> it are on a different pay grade!!!
> 
> "if you get uverse, it will probably be installed by some Polish guy".
> 
> #$&(^%^# union busting?

sounds good to me. Nobody needs union phone company assholes.

hell, fire everybody at the phone company, then shut that shit down.

> So they are using DSL price increases to get customers to switch
> to uverse so they can lay off the expensive DSL techs.

works for me.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <jpk64h$em4$1@reader1.panix.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!pr3ni38167pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news-out.readnews.com!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!panix!panix.com!presence
References: <jpjq78$8m1$1@dont-email.me>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10d5fa,921f0f40a1d2db04
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gid837b0c45a0,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.241.7 with SMTP id we7mr5422405pbc.4.1337826257417;
        Wed, 23 May 2012 19:24:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!pr3ni38167pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news-out.readnews.com!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!panix!panix.com!presence
From: Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com>
Newsgroups: chi.internet
Subject: Re: why the push for DSL->Uverse
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 02:24:17 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Lines: 51
Message-ID: <jpk64h$em4$1@reader1.panix.com>
References: <jpjq78$8m1$1@dont-email.me>
NNTP-Posting-Host: panix1.panix.com
X-Trace: reader1.panix.com 1337826257 15044 166.84.1.1 (24 May 2012 02:24:17 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@panix.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 02:24:17 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: tin/1.8.3-20070201 ("Scotasay") (UNIX) (NetBSD/5.1.2 (i386))