Article View: chi.internet
Article #505Re: why the push for DSL->Uverse
From: smr
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 14:00
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 14:00
32 lines
2466 bytes
2466 bytes
On 5/24/2012 12:19 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote: > dye<dye11@adsl-64-108-195-217.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net> wrote: > >> Recently, I had my DSL Elite bill go up to 43 dollars, and in calls to >> customer billing and finally customer retention, both of them >> tried to get me to switch to Uverse, which surprised me since Uverse >> isn't in Park Ridge (TV Uverse, at least - WOW and Comcrap are the >> only companies w/the franchise in PR.) . . . > >> I forgot to ask him if my voice sevice would be analog over the >> single pair, or converted to VOIP on the modem. > > I got forcibly converted to Uverse from DSL, which I didn't want. Like you, > I'm in a "fake" Uverse area. > > I still have my analog telephone line. > > A friend just had Uverse installed. His neighborhood has real Uverse; I've > seen the VRADs. However, he just got data (they wouldn't give him > old-fashioned DSL). He kept his analog telephone line, too. > > So, for the moment, subscribers aren't yet forced to convert to Uverse VoIP. > > When I had DSL, it was billed to my home phone bill. Uverse is billed > separately. They've been slowly wiring up a VRAD behind my place for the last two months. I'm curious to see what flavor of U-Verse they're actually going to offer out of it. -- smr
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<jples6$6hr$1@ftupet.ftupet.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!pr3ni41571pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!goblin1!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.ripco.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<jpjq78$8m1$1@dont-email.me> <jpkgdr$110$5@news.albasani.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10d5fa,921f0f40a1d2db04
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gid837b0c45a0,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.241.7 with SMTP id we7mr7198050pbc.4.1337868002743;
Thu, 24 May 2012 07:00:02 -0700 (PDT)
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!pr3ni41571pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!goblin1!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.ripco.com!not-for-mail
From: smr <me@shawnritchie.com>
Newsgroups: chi.internet
Subject: Re: why the push for DSL->Uverse
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 09:00:14 -0500
Organization: ftupet.com
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <jples6$6hr$1@ftupet.ftupet.com>
References: <jpjq78$8m1$1@dont-email.me> <jpkgdr$110$5@news.albasani.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ftupet.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: remote5bge0.ripco.com 1337867888 25195 66.246.138.5 (24 May 2012 13:58:08 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ripco.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 13:58:08 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
In-Reply-To: <jpkgdr$110$5@news.albasani.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit