Article View: chi.internet
Article #518Re: no contract
From: Eric
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 14:21
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 14:21
43 lines
2488 bytes
2488 bytes
barbie gee <booger@nosespam.com> wrote in news:alpine.DEB.2.00.1110030716590.19644@sghcrg.sghcrg.pbz: > > > On Sat, 1 Oct 2011, Eric wrote: > >> Bruce Esquibel <bje@ripco.com> wrote in >> news:j66t45$5o7$2@remote5bge0.ripco.com: >> >>> Cydrome Leader <presence@mungepanix.com> wrote: >>>> barbie gee <booger@nosespam.com> wrote: >>> >>>> US Cellular for the cell phone and AT&T DSL for internet even keeps >>>> me pretty happy. >>> >>>> At least I can call AT&T on a phone that really works if the DSL is >>>> acts weird. >>> >>> Yeah but she said she wanted to kill off the DSL and go to wifi >>> wireless. >>> >>> Besides like Cricket and Clearwire, there isn't much choice for >>> that, is there? >>> >>> Pretty sure both of those along with trying to tether to a cell >>> phone isn't going to be without a contract. >>> >>> I'd keep the DSL too, maybe go dry, get rid of the voice service but >>> I don't see it'll be anything in savings worth mentioning. >> >> She won't be happy with wifi wireless, and she'll be locked in a >> contract when she realizes it. I don't know anyone that thinks wifi >> wireless is better than wired DSL. > > why? > too slow? too spotty? Just from reading here people that have had it report that it's either slow or spotty. Read back and see what others have said. -- Coming to you from the beautiful Chicago suburbs
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Xns9F735F249DD1BVRI@66.246.138.5>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!lh7ni10580pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.ripco.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<alpine.DEB.2.00.1109301543370.7749@sghcrg.sghcrg.pbz> <j65gm5$388$2@reader1.panix.com> <j66t45$5o7$2@remote5bge0.ripco.com> <Xns9F7161208744BVRI@66.246.138.5> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1110030716590.19644@sghcrg.sghcrg.pbz>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10d5fa,529e7486479697d0
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gid837b0c45a0,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.50.133 with SMTP id c5mr797777pbo.2.1317652205219;
Mon, 03 Oct 2011 07:30:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!lh7ni10580pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.ripco.com!not-for-mail
From: Eric <ericw2000@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: chi.internet
Subject: Re: no contract
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 14:21:12 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: VRI
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <Xns9F735F249DD1BVRI@66.246.138.5>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1109301543370.7749@sghcrg.sghcrg.pbz> <j65gm5$388$2@reader1.panix.com> <j66t45$5o7$2@remote5bge0.ripco.com> <Xns9F7161208744BVRI@66.246.138.5> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1110030716590.19644@sghcrg.sghcrg.pbz>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ftupet.com
X-Trace: remote5bge0.ripco.com 1317652202 20506 66.246.138.5 (3 Oct 2011 14:30:02 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ripco.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 14:30:02 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25