🚀 go-pugleaf

On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 16:59:22 -0500, Mark Anderson wrote:

> In article me@shawnritchie.com says...
>> Yeah, I build networks for a good living, thanks.
> 
> It doesn't matter what you say you can do; what matters is that you can 
> do as you say.

Oh, I can, duder. Try me.

>> The fact that you're running this "experiment", and I apologize to that
>> word since what you're doing here barely qualifies for it, using shitty
>> consumer-grade APs, 
> 
> This is rich.  Not knowing the problem space nor a single requirement 
> you somehow have an idea on its implementation.  

Your design has led you to have to manually power-cycle APs multiple times
per day. And you think that, by blocking _websites_, you've somehow blocked
the majority of porn traffic, well... 

You also admit you can't govern this well enough to avoid having to just
shut it all down due to, according to your weirldy judgmental language,
"porno addicts" and "perverts".

I think the average user would be safer raw-dogging a west Chicago Ave.
hooker than attaching a device to your "free" wifi network.

> This is a different bug than what Bruce mentioned and not being an Apple 
> fanboi I don't know where to hunt down their bugs (although to Apple 
> fanbois, any problems are someone else's fault. Apples are infallible).  
> I posted here because I found it interesting and maybe someone with 
> knowledge (not you obviously) would have some insight on a recent 
> upgrade cycle with MacBooks.

Yes. It's a good tactic to blandly and incorrectly insult the entire
userbase that's likely to have the answer you're too incompetent to find
yourself. Let us know how that works out.

-- 
smr