Re: is this really true about Comcast?

Article View: chi.internet

Article #94

#94

From: Bruce Esquibel
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 12:56

19 lines
1588 bytes

MacOwner <macowner@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://redd.it/19na4s

Yeah, appears to be.

Keep in mind it's for the upper two tiers of service, most people with the
bundled services aren't on those.

They started rolling that out on the east coast back in january, seems to
work as advertised.

I've seen some people on the lower services also say they got a slight bump
but I think it's more imagination than reality.

As far as I know, the 50mb service which doubled to 100mb with that, is
something like $90 a month on stand-alone.

-bruce
bje@ripco.com

Technical Details

Message-ID: <kh7ee7$ai$1@remote5bge0.ripco.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!q9ni2118pba.1!nntp.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.ripco.com!not-for-mail

References: <macowner-386D2E.08403105032013@remote5bge0.ripco.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 10d5fa,292e1c2e9041e48
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gid837b0c45a0,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Received: by 10.68.234.202 with SMTP id ug10mr5833542pbc.6.1362574599674;
        Wed, 06 Mar 2013 04:56:39 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!q9ni2118pba.1!nntp.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.ripco.com!not-for-mail
From: Bruce Esquibel <bje@ripco.com>
Newsgroups: chi.internet
Subject: Re: is this really true about Comcast?
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 12:56:39 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Ripco Communications Inc.
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <kh7ee7$ai$1@remote5bge0.ripco.com>
References: <macowner-386D2E.08403105032013@remote5bge0.ripco.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: shell3.ripco.com
X-Trace: remote5bge0.ripco.com 1362574599 338 66.251.253.170 (6 Mar 2013 12:56:39 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ripco.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 12:56:39 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: tin/1.4.5-20010409 ("One More Nightmare") (UNIX) (SunOS/5.10 (i86pc))

Reply to Parent Message