Article View: chi.mail
Article #639Re: Gerry Swetsky
From: Tina Sikorski
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 1994 05:11
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 1994 05:11
49 lines
3090 bytes
3090 bytes
Followups set to alt.flame In article <CrF5CB.L4x@espada.chi.il.us>, Gerry Swetsky <lisbon@vpnet.chi.il.us> wrote: >In article <2tkbcn$m2g@venus.mcs.com>, Tina Sikorski <tina@MCS.COM> wrote: >> >>Which part of "Don't send me any more e-mail" did you fail to understand, >>Gerry? > > If you don't want E-mail from me, there are numerous ways to > implement this. Karl will be kind enough to explain these to you > I'm certain. Or you, the bastion of Usenet etiquette, COULD have just not sent me any more e-mail...or do you only scream about Usenet etiquette if other people do things you don't like? > > Would you care to hear what I think of your posting my private > E-mail on the Net? Under normal circumstances I would not post e-mail to the net. However.... > Tina, this is all I intend to say on this subject (pause for the > sigh of relief for the audience). I took our discussion to E-mail > so as to abide with the rules of etiqutte on Usenet. By the way, > what day last week did you discover Usenet anyhow? a) no one asked us to take it to e-mail. If they had, and it were in the realm of things that belonged in e-mail, I would have cheerfully a) deleted your e-mail on sight and/or b) set up a filter to send all mail from you to /dev/null. b) the discussion was not between you and me. The discussion was posted to a newsgroup and was a general statement commenting on my opinion about a specific thing that was already being discussed. If it were a back-and-forth between you and me (on a personal level), then it would have properly been taken to e-mail. Since the discussion was on-going and numerous people were contributing to it, that made it appropriate for the forum it was in. If you don't understand that distinction, then perhaps I should ask you when YOU discovered Usenet. c) This got posted here because AFTER telling you that I had no desire to receive any more e-mail from you, YOU SENT ME MAIL AGAIN. Under normal circumstances, I'd e-mail your postmaster....but that wouldn't get me anymore in this case, now would it? I think that anyone using vpnet or considering doing so might want to know that a person that seems to be involved with helping run it doesn't understand this sort of thing.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2tm2it$b4r@Venus.mcs.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!sashimi.wwa.com!ddsw1!not-for-mailReferences:
<2tkbcn$m2g@venus.mcs.com> <CrF5CB.L4x@espada.chi.il.us>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10e835,b23632a1af29d248 X-Google-Attributes: gid10e835,public X-Google-Thread: f8d04,b23632a1af29d248 X-Google-Attributes: gidf8d04,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-06-15 05:49:40 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!sashimi.wwa.com!ddsw1!not-for-mail From: tina@MCS.COM (Tina Sikorski) Newsgroups: chi.mail,chi.general Subject: Re: Gerry Swetsky Followup-To: alt.flame Date: 15 Jun 1994 00:11:57 -0500 Organization: Another MCSNet Subscriber, Chicago's First Public-Access Internet! Lines: 50 Distribution: chi Message-ID: <2tm2it$b4r@Venus.mcs.com> References: <2tkbcn$m2g@venus.mcs.com> <CrF5CB.L4x@espada.chi.il.us> NNTP-Posting-Host: venus.mcs.com