Article View: chi.mail
Article #856Re: Mail to compuserve (Was Re: mail to prodigy)
From: David W. Tamkin
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 1992 05:57
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 1992 05:57
37 lines
2596 bytes
2596 bytes
ignatz@chinet.chi.il.us (Dave Ihnat) wrote in <1992Jun2.220021.1124@chinet.chi.il.us>: | Now the bad news: Whoever is the Compuserve sender OR receiver is billed | for the mail on a per-message basis. Yes, if I send you mail, *your* | Compuserve account is billed for it. Not exactly right. The recipient on CIS is billed for connect time spent reading mail that arrived over the Internet even if he or she is on the new plan (now named the "standard" plan: higher monthly fee but no connect charges nor communications surcharges for time in certain areas, including email). If the addressee on CIS is under the old billing plan (now renamed "alternative") and is still paying the lower monthly fee but paying for all connect time spent in the email area, it makes no difference to his or her billing that the letter arrived over the Internet rather than from within CIS. Moreover, if an addressee, even one on the standard plan, scans his or her incoming email, sees a letter that came over the Internet, and deletes it (or lets it expire) without reading it, again there is no charge. Just getting mail through the Internet gateway does not incur a fee. | If you send me mail from Compuserve, your account is billed for it. True. | Know anyone's account that you really hate? You cannot raise anyone's CIS bill by sending him or her email. In order to get stuck, the CIS user whom you hate must decide to read it. For myself, I don't care; I'm on the old plan and all incoming email costs me the same to read regardless of source, and it certainly costs the same to leave unread. David W. Tamkin Box 59297 Northtown Station, Illinois 60659-0297 dattier@gagme.chi.il.us CompuServe: 73720,1570 MCI Mail: 426-1818 Email through the Internet to 73720.1570@compuserve.com will be ignored.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Jun4.055728.731@gagme.chi.il.us>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!tellab5!vpnet!serveme!dattierReferences:
<1992Jun1.223018.25825@midway.uchicago.edu> <1992Jun2.145022.13651@chinet.chi.il.us> <1992Jun2.220021.1124@chinet.chi.il.us>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f8d04,ea664f87519762cd X-Google-Attributes: gidf8d04,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-06-04 03:04:18 PST Newsgroups: chi.mail Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!tellab5!vpnet!serveme!dattier From: dattier@gagme.chi.il.us (David W. Tamkin) Subject: Re: Mail to compuserve (Was Re: mail to prodigy) Message-ID: <1992Jun4.055728.731@gagme.chi.il.us> Originator: dattier@gagme Lines: 37 Sender: usenet@serveme.chi.il.us (Usenet) Organization: Gagme Public Access Seraglio, Chicago, Illinois 60656-1252 References: <1992Jun1.223018.25825@midway.uchicago.edu> <1992Jun2.145022.13651@chinet.chi.il.us> <1992Jun2.220021.1124@chinet.chi.il.us> Distribution: chi Date: Thu, 4 Jun 1992 05:57:28 GMT