🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1994May29.033720.10935@usr.com> cbrowne@usr.com (Christopher L. Browne) writes:
>From: cbrowne@usr.com (Christopher L. Browne)
>Subject: Re: Interminable Clinton Bashing
>Date: Sun, 29 May 1994 03:37:20 GMT

>In article <janik-240594122254@janikmac.spss.com>, janik@spss.com (Ed Janik) says:

>>
>>Why is it that when President Clinton's approval rating has been hovering 
>>around 50% for the last two years, about 90% of the calls on WLS in any
>>given hour (and let's not even include Rush in this) are absolutely
>>anti-Clinton?  Why is it that there are so many callers who say he can't
>>get reelected, or nominated by his own party in '96...why are callers
>>talking
>>impeachment when as far as we know he hasn't even done anything wrong...

>why it's because the media doesn't want to be left out of any press releases! 
>can you imagine what would happen if all the major news sources starting touting 
>90% dis-approval? none of them would be called to the press conferences, and WE 
>wouldn't be kept up to date with the latest propoganda and capitol rhetoric! :)

>Clbe

So - are you are claiming that 90% of Americans disapprove of Clinton and 
there is a huge media conspiracy covering up that fact so they can get copy?  
That's quite an implication you made.  Where is the evidence?

=========================================================================
Daniel P. Sniderman  | The Trombone Liberation Front
slide@interaccess.com|         
(708) 475-1454       |      Louder, Faster, Higher!
=========================================================================