🚀 go-pugleaf

Michele <really@areyoukiddingme.net> wrote:
>On 9/17/2011 7:09 AM, Geoff Gass wrote:
>>Mark Anderson<mea@nospambradnylion.com>  wrote:
>>>glg@tanzenmb.com says...

>>>>>Don't ask why I'm listening to Milt Rosenberg right now.

>>>>because you're secretly 75 years old?

>>>Because I want to get into the mind of the angry old man so I don't
>>>become one myself one day.  I can't stomach Hannity or Limbaugh who
>>>cater to ignorant angry old men.

>>>What also fascinates me is why someone like Milt Rosenberg, who is an
>>>academic himself, thinks Sarah Palin, a woman who barely graduated from
>>>college with a sports journalism degree, is intelligent.  My theory:
>>>Angry old men get turned on by a pretty face, thin waist, and big boobs
>>>like everyone else.

>>I don't start lying to myself and telling myself that the pretty face, thin
>>waist, and big boobs is intelligent when she's a moron

>Sure, but you know countless other guys are using that as an excuse when 
>they feel a stirring in their groin.

I was briefly amused, if not stimulated, when McCain announced her as
his running mate. It shook up the campaign during a period in which the
presidential race had become dull and complacent. For a few days, she
really did make things exciting.

I have no idea how any man would find her intelligent at any point,
unless she's some sort of female Clinton.

Quite frankly, I found Michele (hah! she spells her name like you) Bachman
to be intelligent for a brief period after she came on the national stage,
but that wore off very quickly. Now that she's serving up junk science
in debate versus Rick Perry on the malicious lie about the HPV vaccine,
she makes me long for the intelligence of Sarah Palin.

Can someone explain to me how being against disease isn't good politics
and isn't pro life?

Can I get a vaccine against Republicans who make me sick?