🚀 go-pugleaf

Adam H. Kerman wrote:
> 
> trent  <oozenet@trentland.com> wrote:
> >Adam H. Kerman wrote:
> 
> >>In the August 10 Chicago Reader, there's a paragraph in the Letters
> >>section noting that the Reader's Guide was discontinued.
> 
> >Cool- I wasn't much of a fan of the "suburbanified version" of the
> >Reader.
> 
> I used to get it for the suburban movie and theater listings that
> weren't in the Chicago Reader. The trouble is that the Chicago Reader
> takes up so much more space than Reader's Guide did, I wonder if certain
> stores that took Reader's Guide will decide they don't have room for
> Chicago Reader.

Oh- you were actually using it for information, sorryforthat.

I don't like my paper "filtered" by location.  I read (past tense, until
now?) the Reader to get what the Reader had to offer, not their
interpretation of what I should like now that I live in the suburbs.  If
I want local, I read local.

trent



-- 
"This user has a pattern of behaviour in the usenet group chi.forsale
that borders on abusive."