Article View: chi.misc
Article #10Re: *** Chicago Casinos " VOTE " ***
From: Jonathan E. Quist
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1993 18:09
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1993 18:09
47 lines
3068 bytes
3068 bytes
In article <9301061587@drktowr.chi.il.us> magus@drktowr.chi.il.us (Louis Giliberto) writes: >Sean M. Foley (sfoley@uumeme.chi.il.us) wrote: >Hmm. Depends on your perspective. You are seeing the casino as attracting >tourists. I see it as an added bonus if you have a convention here. If? >After all, what type of tourism is there in Chicago? Not much. You don't >have a resort atmosphere with the weather and all. However, Chicago is >great for conventions. It's centrally located with 2 major airports and >a private plane airport (Miggs), Rail and bus have central locations here, >good public transportation, museums, etc. I daresay the majority of the aircraft based at and/or using Meigs field are commercial, not private. Unfortunately, its location and layout make it a relatively unreliable field due to prevailing winds. I'd much rather see the big investment made into high speed rail links between Chicago and other midwestern cities, which would make the area doubly attractive by providing both long range air and medium range rail transport. Upgrading the rail system would provide jobs, would avoid the need for the fiasco of siting a third major airport in the area, and would benefit the long-term stability of the region. >1 Casino will *not* attract tourists, but it may help boost the number >of conventions. In the past year we've seen conventions moved from other cities because of a dispute over recognizing Martin Luther King's birthday and because of the anti-gay legislation passed in Colorado. How many of them moved to Las Vegas or Atlantic City? According to the statistics I've seen (which were, to be honest, presented by an anti-gambling group) the introduction of casinos into Atlantic City cost 2 jobs for every 1 job created. Why does Chicago need explosive growth anyhow? Wouldn't long-term stability be far more beneficial? Gradually creating new jobs over a long time would seem to be better for current residents - creating a lot of new jobs in a short time would draw a lot of new residents into the area, increasing the demand for public services, and when the casinos drive out existing jobs, increasing the demand for public assistance. -- Jonathan E. Quist Lachman Technology, Incorporated jeq@i88.isc.com '71 CL450-K4 "Gleep", DoD #094 Naperville, IL __ There's nothing quite like the pitter-patter of little feet, \/ followed by the words "Daddy! Yay!"
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan08.180937.3548@i88.isc.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!convex!linac!att!mcdchg!laidbak!jeqReferences:
<1993Jan06.110247.3112@uumeme.chi.il.us> <9301061587@drktowr.chi.il.us>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: chi.misc,chi.mail,chi.general Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!convex!linac!att!mcdchg!laidbak!jeq From: jeq@i88.isc.com (Jonathan E. Quist) Subject: Re: *** Chicago Casinos " VOTE " *** Message-ID: <1993Jan08.180937.3548@i88.isc.com> Sender: usenet@i88.isc.com (Usenet News) Nntp-Posting-Host: birdie.i88.isc.com Organization: Lachman Technology, Incorporated, Naperville, IL References: <1993Jan06.110247.3112@uumeme.chi.il.us> <9301061587@drktowr.chi.il.us> Distribution: chi Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1993 18:09:37 GMT Lines: 47