🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1993Jan4.191912.9937@midway.uchicago.edu>,
elle@kimbark.uchicago.edu (Ellen Keyne Seebacher) writes:
>In article <1i9jrvINN5j7@fnnews.fnal.gov> 
> behnke@FNALF.FNAL.GOV follows up my article:
>>>Which means that non-Christians can't buy on that block?  Gee, I thought
>>>restrictive covenants were illegal.
>>
>>Not at all.  I meant that in order to live within the association boundries,
>>one must agree to put up the decorations, despite religious beliefs.
>
>Yes.  Right.  Substitute "one must agree to put up a cross, despite
>religious beliefs" or "one must agree not to keep pork in one's home,
>despite religious beliefs," and tell us whether those would stand a
>long-overdue court challenge.
>
>--                    __
>Ellen Keyne Seebacher \/             elle@midway.uchicago.edu

If some of you had properly read the original post you would have noticed
that it's not just Christian, but it's also Charlie Brown theme.

These people don't care what their neighbors beliefs are, they just want
them to participate in the christmas lighting with either christian or
charlie brown themes.

Just my $.02

Rich

|Animals eat animals     |ADDR1: rmartine@harper.UUCP          *preferred*  |
|Creation eats the winner|ADDR2: electric@meltdown.chi.il.us   *preferred*  |
|Fall down to the beetles|ADDR3: knight22@amiganet.chi.il.us                |
|and start back up again |           Commit random acts of Kindness         |