🚀 go-pugleaf

On Wed, 30 May 2007, kenji wrote:

> In article <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705301018050.24275@sghcrg.sghcrg.pbz>,
> barbie gee <barbie.gee@NOSESPAMgmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 30 May 2007, kenji wrote:
>>
>>> In article <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705300645500.20159@sghcrg.sghcrg.pbz>,
>>> barbie gee <barbie.gee@NOSESPAMgmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2007, kenji wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705292244540.10598@sghcrg.sghcrg.pbz>,
>>>>> barbie gee <barbie.gee@NOSESPAMgmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2007, kenji wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705291808430.5440@sghcrg.sghcrg.pbz>,
>>>>>>> barbie gee <barbie.gee@NOSESPAMgmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2007, kenji wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705291615400.32115@sghcrg.sghcrg.pbz>,
>>>>>>>>> barbie gee <barbie.gee@NOSESPAMgmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2007, kenji wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <f3hvjr$5v2$8@e250.ripco.com>, Sarlo <sarlo@ripco.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> kenji <kenji@ripco.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> she does have a fake ID though.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have a legal daughter and you never told me?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gimmi some digits.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> my phone is listed, Numbnuts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Wrong digits. I'm talking measurments.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You should know better!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> she's got her mom's figure, she's a 100lb'er.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I dare you to take a photo of the number on the bathroom scale of
>>>>>>>>>> each
>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>> them standing on it, separately of course.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> They say "105", but I'm sure the scale sez something different.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> we don't own a scale
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> they both have size 2 clothing, if that means anything
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> skinny like crack hores?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> nope....hips,tits and asses
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> they have it, but do they actually wear it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> then they're catalog shopping or something, because for a size 2, (oh
>>>>>> and, is that pants? dresses? jackets? what?) it's like a miniscule
>>>>>> waist,
>>>>>> miniscule hips, miniscule boobs.  Or it's all vanity sized.  You can
>>>>>> hardly even find a size 2 in any regular store.  Size 4 is generally the
>>>>>> smallest you see on the racks.
>>>>>
>>>>> the daughter is selling clothes at an upper end store now so I think she
>>>>> knows her shit...actually I think she works where geoffie's gurl
>>>>> works...that is if he's  still with the girl.....
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> upper end = vanity sizing.
>>>>
>>>> google it.
>>>
>>> I'm not really that interested, Brab. I don't wear or buy women's
>>> clothing.
>>>
>>
>>   my point being "Size 2" is pretty much meaningless.
>> weight on a scale, height on a ruler, that's meaningful data.
>
> so's a tag that is sewn into their clothing, Numbnuts.
>

meaningless, you mean.

get me real quantitative numbers.