🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705301320510.28201@sghcrg.sghcrg.pbz>,
 barbie gee <barbie.gee@NOSESPAMgmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 30 May 2007, kenji wrote:
> 
> > In article <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705301018050.24275@sghcrg.sghcrg.pbz>,
> > barbie gee <barbie.gee@NOSESPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 30 May 2007, kenji wrote:
> >>
> >>> In article <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705300645500.20159@sghcrg.sghcrg.pbz>,
> >>> barbie gee <barbie.gee@NOSESPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Tue, 29 May 2007, kenji wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> In article <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705292244540.10598@sghcrg.sghcrg.pbz>,
> >>>>> barbie gee <barbie.gee@NOSESPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2007, kenji wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> In article <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705291808430.5440@sghcrg.sghcrg.pbz>,
> >>>>>>> barbie gee <barbie.gee@NOSESPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2007, kenji wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> In article <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705291615400.32115@sghcrg.sghcrg.pbz>,
> >>>>>>>>> barbie gee <barbie.gee@NOSESPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2007, kenji wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> In article <f3hvjr$5v2$8@e250.ripco.com>, Sarlo <sarlo@ripco.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> kenji <kenji@ripco.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> she does have a fake ID though.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have a legal daughter and you never told me?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gimmi some digits.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> my phone is listed, Numbnuts.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Wrong digits. I'm talking measurments.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> You should know better!
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> she's got her mom's figure, she's a 100lb'er.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I dare you to take a photo of the number on the bathroom scale of
> >>>>>>>>>> each
> >>>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>> them standing on it, separately of course.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> They say "105", but I'm sure the scale sez something different.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> we don't own a scale
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> they both have size 2 clothing, if that means anything
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> skinny like crack hores?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> nope....hips,tits and asses
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> they have it, but do they actually wear it?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> then they're catalog shopping or something, because for a size 2, (oh
> >>>>>> and, is that pants? dresses? jackets? what?) it's like a miniscule
> >>>>>> waist,
> >>>>>> miniscule hips, miniscule boobs.  Or it's all vanity sized.  You can
> >>>>>> hardly even find a size 2 in any regular store.  Size 4 is generally 
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>> smallest you see on the racks.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> the daughter is selling clothes at an upper end store now so I think 
> >>>>> she
> >>>>> knows her shit...actually I think she works where geoffie's gurl
> >>>>> works...that is if he's  still with the girl.....
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> upper end = vanity sizing.
> >>>>
> >>>> google it.
> >>>
> >>> I'm not really that interested, Brab. I don't wear or buy women's
> >>> clothing.
> >>>
> >>
> >>   my point being "Size 2" is pretty much meaningless.
> >> weight on a scale, height on a ruler, that's meaningful data.
> >
> > so's a tag that is sewn into their clothing, Numbnuts.
> >
> 
> meaningless, you mean.
> 
> get me real quantitative numbers.

what's the tags in your clothing say?