🚀 go-pugleaf

ev@chorus.fr (Eric Valette) writes:
>  *      I would like to have opinions about the best way to check constructor
>  *      parameters validity and report error to caller: I think that something
>  *      is missing in the way you can report error to user using Cfront 2.0

This is true and is one of the main motivations behind the addition of
exceptions to the language.  In the meantime, about the best that can be
done is to add a member function that can be interrogated after allocation
to ensure that the constructor succeeded; something like

                if (!(p = new some_class) || p->ctor_failed()) {
                   delete p;    // allowed even if p == 0
                   // handle cleanup
                   }

-- William M. Miller, Glockenspiel, Ltd.
   wmm@world.std.com