Article View: cis.winnt.general
Article #134MCSE transcender question about permissions
From: Mark
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 00:00
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 00:00
63 lines
3275 bytes
3275 bytes
This question is on the transcender is confusing me. I thought that when a user is accessing a share over the network the most restrictive set of permissions apply. In the case below why does Nancy get the least restrictive permissions even though she is accessing the share over the network? Can someone explain this better?? =============================================== 24. Jack has an account on a Windows NT Workstation machine that contains a folder called \ShareMe. The folder resides on an NTFS partition on Jack's machine. Nancy wants to access the \ShareMe folder on Jack's machine remotely from her own Windows NT Workstation computer. Both Jack and Nancy belong to the following user groups in the domain that have these permissions for the \ShareMe folder: GROUP NAME SHARE PERMISSIONS NTFS PERMISSIONS Developers Change Add (WX) (Not Specified) Managers Change Read (RX) (RX) Everyone Read List (RX) (Not Specified) Users Read List (RX) (Not Specified) What are Jack and Nancy's effective permissions for the \ShareMe folder? a. Jack: List permission Nancy: Read permission b. Jack: Add permission Nancy: Read permission c. Jack: Add permission Nancy: Add permission d. Jack: Add and Read permission Nancy: Change permission e. Jack: Add and Read permission Nancy: Add and Read permission Choice e is correct. When logging on locally, a user's level of access for a folder is determined by his least restrictive level of access. This is the level of permission a user has for accessing an NTFS folder locally. In the above question, Jack's access levels for the four groups he belongs to are: Add, Read, List and List. The least restrictive level of these is Add and Read permissions. The least restrictive of Nancy's four share permissions is Change permission. Since the NTFS permissions on the workstation also apply to her user account, the most restrictive permission is determined by combining her effective share permission (Change) with her effective NTFS permission (Add and Read). Her effective NTFS permission is the same as it is for Jack. This is Add and Read permission. When No Access permission is combined with any other permission, an access level of No Access is always the result. NTCP, pp. 129-131; WSRK, Chapter 18, Comparing FAT and NTFS File Systems, p. 615. ============================================== Remove NOSPAM from my E-mail address to reply! Thanks, Mark
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<36A78745.CA0DEB80@NOSPAMmm13.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fb96d,17bb533fd6526ed8,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfb96d,public From: Mark <mark@NOSPAMmm13.com> Subject: MCSE transcender question about permissions Date: 1999/01/21 Message-ID: <36A78745.CA0DEB80@NOSPAMmm13.com> X-Deja-AN: 435338570 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: None MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: Mark@NOSPAMmm13.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 11:58:03 PDT Newsgroups: cis.winnt.general