🚀 go-pugleaf

bathroom@iglou2.iglou.com (Tim Brown) writes:

>Jack Zucker <jaz@gwis.com> writes:

>>Matt Walcoff wrote:
>>> 
>>> NOTE: THIS MESSAGE IS POSTED TO SEVERAL NEWSGROUPS. PLEASE RESPOND
>>> DIRECTLY TO THE AUTHOR OR REMOVE EXTRANEOUS NEWSGROUP NAMES WHEN
>>> REPLYING.
>>> 
>>> Attention youth rights supporters:
>>> 
>>> The Ohio legislature is considering restricting the driving rights of
>>> young people.

>>I'm not convinced that this is such a bad thing. How does this effect
>>personal freedom as you claim in your post ?

>I'm not convinced it's not a completely retarded thing.  It affects
>personal freedom in a big way, as only Nazi countries do.

ATTENTION: "Politically correct sheep"

Driving is a PRIVELEGE.... NOT a right.  

Keeping kids under a tight rein is definitely necessary in today's 
society. 

1: Safety and security FOR the kids.
2: Safety and security FROM the kids.

Always has to be _someone_ who is against something..... sheesh!


-- 
John L. Wilkerson Jr.               jwilkers@netcom.com

Rec.radio.cb FAQ located at my Web site:
                          http://members.tripod.com/~jwilkers/cbpage.html

Supporting two-way radio for the family of the 90s.
   Spamgard(tm) in effect to attend to unwanted commercial email.
   Procmail filters auto-delete bogus addresses, MIME and HTML encoded mail.