Article View: cle.general
Article #788Re: LAST WORD 6/17/97//OHIO AS FAR report: Driving rights in jeopardy
From: Daniel Modlin
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 1997 00:00
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 1997 00:00
69 lines
3421 bytes
3421 bytes
mark carroll wrote: > > In article <33B15226.20CA@earthlink.net>, > Daniel Modlin <dmodlin@earthlink.net> wrote: > >mark carroll wrote: > >> In article <33B0408A.6BCA@earthlink.net>, > >> Daniel Modlin <dmodlin@earthlink.net> wrote: > >> (snip) > >> >Your forgetting about unjust laws,the better that police get at > >> >enforcing privacy invasive laws, the more our privacy will be invaded. > >> (snip) > >> > >> You're against photographing criminals-in-the-act as evidence because > >> of an invasion of privacy?!? > > > >It depends on the "criminal" and the "crime"he commits. There are many > >unjust laws out there that i dont care to see enforced. > > That's fine, but the way to deal with it is _not_ to cheer when > they're broken. THat seems to be the only working alternative we have left. You can't go allowing people to ignore laws they don't > agree with - if laws aren't enforced, you have anarchy. If you think a > law's unjust, lobby to get it repealed. Ultimately, the people control > what laws are made, and if most people think that a law is needed then > just maybe you're wrong in thinking it's unjust? If it truly were > unjust, there'd be more politicians elected who were in favour > of abolishing it. Oh please, you act like the polititians are actually controlled by the public. It is almost impossible to get laws changed, even if a large majority of the public is in support of it. > > (snip) > >I wasn't talking about laws regarding red lights,and as for speeding > >laws,hooray for Montana for repealing their ineffectual speed limit. > > Well, I just mentioned the red-light laws because I wondered if you'd > construe that photographing as an invasion of privacy too. It's a > similar situation: driving in a manner that's unreasonably likely to > cause injury or death. > > Why are speed limits unjust, then? Because they don't work! If you remove them, mortality rates > on the roads go up significantly (at least they seem to in Germany, > ISTR) Where do you get your figures? The German government and Mercedes Benz both verify that the mortalaity rates are the same in both countries. - is enforcing speed limits to keep mortality rates down unjust? It wouldnt be if they worked. BTW, of course i'm only referring to highway speed limits. > Surely people have the right to relatively safe travel? And the right to travel without Uncle Sam in the back seat.-------Daniel > > -- Mark
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<33B19814.4D98@earthlink.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<33A0BEF1.7D55@wam.umd.edu> <33B0408A.6BCA@earthlink.net> <5opodu$a9l$1@news.cis.ohio-state.edu> <33B15226.20CA@earthlink.net> <5orvea$lbo$1@news.cis.ohio-state.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 108bc6,f88114e10bfb0c63 X-Google-Attributes: gid108bc6,public X-Google-Thread: 10b9bd,f88114e10bfb0c63 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b9bd,public X-Google-Thread: 106a7c,f88114e10bfb0c63 X-Google-Attributes: gid106a7c,public X-Google-Thread: 111b67,f88114e10bfb0c63 X-Google-Attributes: gid111b67,public From: Daniel Modlin <dmodlin@earthlink.net> Subject: Re: LAST WORD 6/17/97//OHIO AS FAR report: Driving rights in jeopardy Date: 1997/06/25 Message-ID: <33B19814.4D98@earthlink.net> X-Deja-AN: 252567023 References: <33A0BEF1.7D55@wam.umd.edu> <33B0408A.6BCA@earthlink.net> <5opodu$a9l$1@news.cis.ohio-state.edu> <33B15226.20CA@earthlink.net> <5orvea$lbo$1@news.cis.ohio-state.edu> Organization: EarthLink Network, Inc. Reply-To: dmodlin@earthlink.net Newsgroups: cle.general,oh.general,k12.chat.senior,talk.politics.libertarian