Article View: cmh.network
Article #179homework networking
From: TIYM
Date: Sun, 04 Jul 1999 00:00
Date: Sun, 04 Jul 1999 00:00
70 lines
4690 bytes
4690 bytes
I started a class and i have no clue on this, help please ACE COMPUTER SERVICES, INC. Ace Computer Services, Inc. (ACS) is a subsidiary of Ace Corp. that provides computer and data processing consulting and software development services to the rest of Ace and also to many outside clients. ACS is in process of moving into several new office buildings. ACS decided to develop a data wiring plan for all of Ace. The plan would initially be tested in the new buildings. Based upon this experiment, a master plan for all current and new buildings for ACS and Ace as a whole is to be developed, with wiring to be retrofitted to existing buildings. Ace has a pressing need for a consistent single-medium solution to its data communications needs. A typical Ace employee changes locations every nine to twelve months, and along with the employee goes his or her terminal. Looked at another way, it is not unusual for 50% of the installed data terminals to be moved at Ace each year. Because there is a variety of cable types used to support the current data terminal inventory, this presents cabling nightmare for the wire maintenance crew. Furthermore, apart from the problems of moving terminals, it is difficult to troubleshoot cable problems in existing buildings because of the different types of cable trays. A lot of computer downtime at ace has been attributed to locating the correct cable. To install and maintain a separate type of wore for every different type of terminal is costly and time consuming. Prewiring new and existing buildings with a single type of cable can minimize the impact of moves, additions, and changes as well as cable faults. Acs's solution was to choose shielded 22 gauge twisted-pair cable containing four solid cooper conductors that will support data speeds up to 16 Mbps in both directions (one twisted pair of cooper conductors for each direction). This cable is designed to let users permanently wire buildings in a systematic way. On each floor of a building, twisted pair is installed between a wiring closet (usually the telephone closet) and each office. By appropriate patching in the wire closed and by use of interconnections between closets on different floors, any form of wore interconnection can be implemented. When the wiring is completed, from 80 to 90 percent of Ace's terminals and computers will wun on this type of cable. Some Specialized graphics workstations, however, will not work on this cable because they use more than four conductors. The wiring scheme was first tested in a new building at 2RP in Renton, Washington. Occupancy of 2RP was set for July 1986, and two teams were put together in January 1986. The first team, called the Implementation Committee, was responsible for overseeing the process of installing the cable. The second team, called the ACS committee, was responsible for assuring that the wiring satisfied user requirements and that data processing equipment was properly installed. Each of the two groups met every week from late January 1986 until completion of the building in July 1986. The ACS committee met every week after completion of the building to make sure all computing equipment went in without a problem. The equipment was installed during every weekend from the first of July until the end of August. The results from 2RP were highly satisfactory. All terminals came up immediately without any downtime. Detailed cable records and cable albeling allow ACS to relocate devices, to make alterations easily, and to quickly isolate any faults. The shielded twisted pair provides excellent performance (few errors) even at very high data rates. Discussion Questions: 1. The installation activity seems to have involved a lot of people in the two committees and to have consumed a lot of their time. Was this justified or was Ace being too cautious? 2. How would you go about justifying the cable installation project to top management? What costs savings or other benefits justify the resources involved? 3. How would you measure the effects of this project? Can you propose quantitative measures that can be used after the fact to(a) demonstrate that the project was worth it and (b) quantify the benefits? MY EMAIL IS: sanabria@crosslink.net
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<19990703235115.20246.00007210@ng-fu1.aol.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 107db2,c18303cec4eb66a1,start X-Google-Attributes: gid107db2,public From: tiym@aol.com (TIYM) Subject: homework networking Date: 1999/07/04 Message-ID: <19990703235115.20246.00007210@ng-fu1.aol.com> X-Deja-AN: 496945747 Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com Newsgroups: cmh.network X-Admin: news@aol.com