🚀 go-pugleaf

> ==> si@SJTU(�����Ĵ�)                      ˵��: 
> �� �� bb (����) �Ĵ������ᵽ: �� 
> ActiveX����Ļ�Component Object Model(COM)ԶԶ������Java������ 

No. COM is only a simple implementation of software reusability and
sharing. About the orignal ideas, lots of work have been done on various
platforms in various systems by various institutions. 
ActiveX and Java are not concentrated on the same point. Java is more on
VM. It's a different idea from COM. 
Someone said that, very soon, COBOL, C, etc. will have bytecode-oriented
compilers, so Java will lose its advantages. That's completely wrong,
since whether a language will succeed is not only determined by its
functionalities, but more on it's de facto prevalence( as COBOL) , or on
its fitness with the situations( such as Internet).
Yeas, I believe no languages are good enough to say it will be the
standard. Can you say C is better than COBOL, or Pascal is better than C?
definitely not, though they all can be compiled to X86 codes. 

So IMHO, I believe, with the two characteristics:(1) grand propagandation;
(2)suitable for Browser(in fact Internet). Java will get success in some
context. Although you can provide M$ as an exception, Bill Gates surely 
want grasp JAVA. This can be clear if you understand why IE4.0 would like
to be charged $1M/day rather than surrenders.

X.

--
�� ��Դ: �й�ƴ�BBSվ [bbs.ustc.edu.cn]