Re: ��, Pentium MMX 200 �� >> RS6000 59H

Article View: cn.bbs.comp.os2

Article #31

#31

From: dtterm
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 1997 00:00

9 lines
798 bytes

perhaps the process for 59h you preferred is G5 process.
but 59h use xlC 3.1 or above c & c++ compiler, 
I also think that simply compare RISC system process
with MMX is incorrect. Does the MMX can use for CAD/CAM
or large scale MIS system as a server or true workstation?

--
[m[1;31m�� ��Դ:����ˮ˼Դվ bbs.sjtu.edu.cn��[FROM: 202.120.26.123][m

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3LjAVI$zbH@bbs.sjtu.edu.cn>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: 118e73,208741a960a81c6d,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid118e73,public
From: dassault.bbs@bbs.sjtu.edu.cn (dtterm)
Subject: Re: ������, Pentium MMX 200 ���� >> RS6000 59H
Date: 1997/11/30
Message-ID: <3LjAVI$zbH@bbs.sjtu.edu.cn>
X-Deja-AN: 293872171
X-Filename: IBM/M.880889826.A
Organization: ��ˮ˼Դվ
Newsgroups: cn.bbs.comp.os2

Article View: cn.bbs.comp.os2

Re: ������, Pentium MMX 200 ���� >> RS6000 59H

Re: ��, Pentium MMX 200 �� >> RS6000 59H