🚀 go-pugleaf

> cmk128@hotmail.com wrote:
>> Thanks for comment
>>       But i believe if i can do the same as pioneer can do, after all,
>> there must be some inventions in my copy. Look at the japanese, in 60s,
>> they copy american's electronic product. But i think they are must
>> better than american now. Look at chinese spaceship too.
>> thanks
>> from Peter
>
> Well, I say go for it.  Good for you.  People standing on other
> people's shoulders all the time is silly, especially from the
> learning aspect.

If it appeared that the project was going to lead to something novel,
that would be one thing.

But the point of the project seem to be to implement a database based
on three factors:

 a) A 13-year old standard that has been followed by newer ones;

 b) The use of C++ as an implementation language;

 c) The *lack* of use of Yacc.

Only one of those factors seems to relate to anything intriniscally
about databases.

There's no indication of sorts of things that might be interesting,
such as:

 - What storage model is planned?
 - What relationship will this system have to the relational model?
 - What license is planned?

As things stand, it sounds like the plan is to take a block of marble
and chip away everything that doesn't look like an elephant.  All we
know are a few things *not* intended.  Knowing what *is* intended
would be more likely to elicit interest.
-- 
output = ("cbbrowne" "@" "gmail.com")
http://linuxdatabases.info/info/rdbms.html
What hair color do they put on the driver's licenses of bald men?