🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: co.consumers
Article #112

Re: BEWARE of COMPUSA - Before shopping there, read this!!

#112
From: Ching Tai
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 17:01
50 lines
3233 bytes
Hi Bill,

Yes, I would return the item to the no-return-fee store and
buy it from CompUSA IFF CompUSA is _way_ cheaper.  _way_
cheaper for me is at least 20% or more off.  Otherwise, I'd
just ask the no-return-fee store to do a price match.

This cost me the same amount of work, since I usually only
find out about CompUSA's price when I'm in their store, and
to do a price match or return, I would have to go back to the
no-return-fee store anyway.

However, because I hardly every go into a CompUSA, I've not
done the above too often.  Last time I did it was w/ a
digital camera where CompUSA was 25% cheaper, but that was
months ago.  (I only went into CompUSA because it was next
to this hair cutting place.)  But, that was an exception,
I'd say 99% of the time, CompUSA is more expensive.

-Ching

Bill Rubin wrote:
> 
> Ching Tai wrote:
> >
> > Here's my set of rules:
> > 1. Buy things from cheapest store that does not
> >    charge for returns.
> > 2. If a return-fee store (e.g. CompUSA) sells the
> >    same item at >=20% cheaper than the no-return-fee
> >    stores, I'd return the item to the no-return-fee
> >    store and buy it from the return-fee store.
> > 3. If the return-fee store sells the same item at
> >    less than 20% of my purchase price, I go back to
> >    the no-return-fee store and ask for a price match.
> >
> > This way, I reward the no-return-fee AND cheapest
> > stores.  I hate to have all those return-fee stores
> > go out-of-business :)  But I also hate to have to pay
> > a return fee.
> >
> 
> Are you saying that you return opened items to places that don't
> charge a restocking fee and buy it at CompUSA or some other
> store that DOES charge a restocking fee once you've decided that
> you want to keep the item, if they are cheaper? Or am I
> misinterpreting your rule #2? I am sure that all of the stores
> you grace with your business are so thrilled to have it.
> 
> Bill
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3CCECDD2.52D284D2@cisco.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!sn-xit-01!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
References: <3ccce709.59073152@news.easynews.com> <3CCD324D.CD050CAE@Early.com> <3CCDED7A.753D9B80@cisco.com> <3CCE4FD7.978A4845@prodigy.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f6c48,a0292b3d6f4b050d
X-Google-Attributes: gidf6c48,public
X-Google-Thread: 107518,a0292b3d6f4b050d
X-Google-Attributes: gid107518,public
X-Google-Thread: 107cd9,a0292b3d6f4b050d
X-Google-Attributes: gid107cd9,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-30 10:06:01 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!sn-xit-01!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: Ching Tai <ctai@cisco.com>
Newsgroups: co.consumers,misc.consumers,misc.consumers.frugal-living
Subject: Re: BEWARE of COMPUSA - Before shopping there, read this!!
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 10:01:06 -0700
Organization: Cisco Systems Inc.
Message-ID: <3CCECDD2.52D284D2@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en]C-CCK-MCD   (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <3ccce709.59073152@news.easynews.com> <3CCD324D.CD050CAE@Early.com> <3CCDED7A.753D9B80@cisco.com> <3CCE4FD7.978A4845@prodigy.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cache-Post-Path: sj-nntpcache-3!unknown@dhcp-171-71-25-30.cisco.com
X-Cache: nntpcache 2.4.0b2 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com
Lines: 50