Article View: co.consumers
Article #340Re: Just my opinon, but you might want to reconsider using a winmodem...
From: Melissa
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 1999 00:00
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 1999 00:00
65 lines
3431 bytes
3431 bytes
idduno@wudthehell.com (BillyBob) wrote in <s1sufa9924219@corp.supernews.com>: >I have been told by many techs that you should steer far away from ANY >winmodem. The main reason is that they use your computers' own system >resources to run. (software based) > >This can slow your computer down! You will never go wrong with a HARDWARE >based modem. Lucent/Rocwell is an excellent choice. > >My 2 cents.... Ah, that WOULD be true, except these Lucent DSP ones use the DSP ( digital signal processor ) to do just that. I checked my CPU load during a download and found zip. The mouse uses more CPU resources than this particular modem. >Melissa <MelissaS@Wdimensional.com> wrote in message >news:RulT3.405$Og.652@wormhole.dimensional.com... >> Some of you may remember the post I did here awhile back about my >experiences >> with the Amquest Rockwell HCF chip set Winmodem. >> >> I bought it back in March and later found out had one of the worst >> reputations of any ever made. It dropped out on me all the time. >> >> But I later found out that not all Winmodems are bad, nor do they have to >be >> expensive to be good. It seems the Lucent DSP Mars chip set Winmodem is >one >> of the best modems made, and it's cheap. I bought one for $24 from an Ebay >> seller at >> <http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=166397142> >> downloaded the latest generic driver for it at Lucent's site ( version >5.54 >> ), and haven't had a single dropout since. It's been nothing but great for >> me. >> >> If I'm going to complain about the bad ones, I also want to praise the >good >> ones when I find them. This is a VERY good working modem for me. >> >> -- >> - Melissa <http://www.dimensional.com/~melissa/> >> To email me, remove the spam spoofing Caps on each side of the @ >> >> If called upon, would you help? >> <http://www.dimensional.com/~melissa/upanew.htm> >> >> Please boycott Orbital Sciences Corp.& American Express / First Data Corp. >> until they do the right thing! >> <http://www.dimensional.com/~melissa/jennifer.htm> > > > -- - Melissa <http://www.dimensional.com/~melissa/> To email me, remove the spam spoofing Caps on each side of the @ If called upon, would you help? <http://www.dimensional.com/~melissa/upanew.htm> Please boycott Orbital Sciences Corp.& American Express / First Data Corp. until they do the right thing! <http://www.dimensional.com/~melissa/jennifer.htm>
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BAKT3.466$Og.771@wormhole.dimensional.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<RulT3.405$Og.652@wormhole.dimensional.com> <s1sufa9924219@corp.supernews.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 107cd9,3879a2a5ff6c5554 X-Google-Attributes: gid107cd9,public X-Google-Thread: 107518,3879a2a5ff6c5554 X-Google-Attributes: gid107518,public X-Google-Thread: 11474a,3879a2a5ff6c5554 X-Google-Attributes: gid11474a,public X-Google-Thread: 1073ca,3879a2a5ff6c5554 X-Google-Attributes: gid1073ca,public From: MelissaW@Wdimensional.com (Melissa) Subject: Re: Just my opinon, but you might want to reconsider using a winmodem... Date: 1999/11/02 Message-ID: <BAKT3.466$Og.771@wormhole.dimensional.com> X-Deja-AN: 543723708 References: <RulT3.405$Og.652@wormhole.dimensional.com> <s1sufa9924219@corp.supernews.com> X-Trace: wormhole.dimensional.com 941585825 206.124.3.19 (Tue, 02 Nov 1999 16:37:05 MDT) Organization: Dis User-Agent: Xnews/2.09.25 NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 1999 16:37:05 MDT Newsgroups: co.consumers,co.general,alt.consumers.experiences,misc.consumers