Article View: co.denver.general
Article #3979Re: Denver Drivers
From: Chris
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 00:00
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 00:00
56 lines
3214 bytes
3214 bytes
Ben Cantrick wrote: > In article <sli2v1gujev164@corp.supernews.com>, > Dan Duncan <dand@babu.pcisys.net> wrote: > >The NHTSA claims that dialing is as disctracting as operating the > >stereo, and keep in mind that dialing is NOT an act limited to > >handheld phones just as voice-operated dialing is not limited > >to handsfree phones. > > I'd say this depends heavily on the phone. Your radio has presets - > push one button, you're done. Your attention is distracted from > the road for about 2 seconds at max. > > Now try and dial a 10 digit number on your cell phone. And it's > an older model that you have to press the buttons really hard on, > making it impossible to do with one hand... > > I've been in this situation personally and it scared the living > crap out of me. Your attention it taken away from the road for 5 to > 10 seconds. Even if you get smart and hold the phone up on the steering > wheel while you dial, you're still not concentrating on the road. > > I'm not terribly against people talking on the cell phone in > the car. But I'm dead-set against people dialing any non-preset > number on their cell phone while driving. If you've ever done > this yourself you know it's easily as bad as driving drunk. I've brought this up numerous times - generally to a massive yawn Ben, but one company did pioneer a useful solution 10 years ago. That was back in the regime of Mr. Landau roof, fake wire wheel cover I-a-cucco, but Chrysler had a hands free speech recognition visor mounted cell phone in certain of their top end Imperial/LeBaron series models long before we ever got into UHF spectrum. Simple commands - "dial home" or "work" did the trick. The hardware was up top where it wasn't a visual impediment. And the speaker and mike were largely invisible. Right now OnStar has a model that works - push one button and an *operator* comes on. Such a concept - back to the past, with GPS for the present. Where's the future? > > > -Ben > -- > Ben Cantrick (mackys@dim.com) | Yes, the BGC dubs still suck. > BGC Nukem: http://www.dim.com/~mackys/bgcnukem.html > The Spamdogs: http://www.dim.com/~mackys/spamdogs > I'm not crazy, I've just been in a very bad mood for 20 years.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<395988A1.33CFBCFC@net.none>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<u4fvks8e4ovafrt2jduo5nr09uck435s3r@4ax.com> <3957D051.3773C5F@uswest.net> <3957DC3C.7965A8FC@noplace.com> <sli2v1gujev164@corp.supernews.com> <8jb4c2$9t9@flatland.dimensional.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 111e4f,2910037afcee5b61 X-Google-Attributes: gid111e4f,public X-Google-Thread: 1073ca,2910037afcee5b61 X-Google-Attributes: gid1073ca,public From: Chris <mine@net.none> Subject: Re: Denver Drivers Date: 2000/06/27 Message-ID: <395988A1.33CFBCFC@net.none> X-Deja-AN: 639858800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <u4fvks8e4ovafrt2jduo5nr09uck435s3r@4ax.com> <3957D051.3773C5F@uswest.net> <3957DC3C.7965A8FC@noplace.com> <sli2v1gujev164@corp.supernews.com> <8jb4c2$9t9@flatland.dimensional.com> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: news@nmix.net X-Trace: reader.nmix.net 962169223 28836 204.134.124.52 (28 Jun 2000 05:13:43 GMT) Organization: of the mind Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: the, group NNTP-Posting-Date: 28 Jun 2000 05:13:43 GMT Newsgroups: co.denver.general,co.general