🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: co.denver.general
Article #3979

Re: Denver Drivers

#3979
From: Chris
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 00:00
56 lines
3214 bytes

Ben Cantrick wrote:

> In article <sli2v1gujev164@corp.supernews.com>,
> Dan Duncan  <dand@babu.pcisys.net> wrote:
> >The NHTSA claims that dialing is as disctracting as operating the
> >stereo, and keep in mind that dialing is NOT an act limited to
> >handheld phones just as voice-operated dialing is not limited
> >to handsfree phones.
>
>   I'd say this depends heavily on the phone. Your radio has presets -
> push one button, you're done. Your attention is distracted from
> the road for about 2 seconds at max.
>
>   Now try and dial a 10 digit number on your cell phone. And it's
> an older model that you have to press the buttons really hard on,
> making it impossible to do with one hand...
>
>   I've been in this situation personally and it scared the living
> crap out of me. Your attention it taken away from the road for 5 to
> 10 seconds. Even if you get smart and hold the phone up on the steering
> wheel while you dial, you're still not concentrating on the road.
>
>   I'm not terribly against people talking on the cell phone in
> the car. But I'm dead-set against people dialing any non-preset
> number on their cell phone while driving. If you've ever done
> this yourself you know it's easily as bad as driving drunk.

I've brought this up numerous times - generally to a massive yawn Ben, but
one company did pioneer a useful solution 10 years ago.

That was back in the regime of Mr. Landau roof, fake wire wheel cover
I-a-cucco, but Chrysler had a hands free speech recognition visor mounted
cell phone in certain of their top end Imperial/LeBaron series models long
before we ever got into UHF spectrum.

Simple commands - "dial home" or "work" did the trick. The hardware was up
top where it wasn't a visual impediment. And the speaker and mike were
largely invisible.

Right now OnStar has a model that works - push one button and an *operator*
comes on.

Such a concept - back to the past, with GPS for the present.

Where's the future?

>
>
>           -Ben
> --
> Ben Cantrick (mackys@dim.com)        |     Yes, the BGC dubs still suck.
> BGC Nukem:     http://www.dim.com/~mackys/bgcnukem.html
> The Spamdogs:  http://www.dim.com/~mackys/spamdogs
> I'm not crazy, I've just been in a very bad mood for 20 years.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <395988A1.33CFBCFC@net.none>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <u4fvks8e4ovafrt2jduo5nr09uck435s3r@4ax.com> <3957D051.3773C5F@uswest.net> <3957DC3C.7965A8FC@noplace.com> <sli2v1gujev164@corp.supernews.com> <8jb4c2$9t9@flatland.dimensional.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 111e4f,2910037afcee5b61
X-Google-Attributes: gid111e4f,public
X-Google-Thread: 1073ca,2910037afcee5b61
X-Google-Attributes: gid1073ca,public
From: Chris <mine@net.none>
Subject: Re: Denver Drivers
Date: 2000/06/27
Message-ID: <395988A1.33CFBCFC@net.none>
X-Deja-AN: 639858800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <u4fvks8e4ovafrt2jduo5nr09uck435s3r@4ax.com> <3957D051.3773C5F@uswest.net> <3957DC3C.7965A8FC@noplace.com> <sli2v1gujev164@corp.supernews.com> <8jb4c2$9t9@flatland.dimensional.com>
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: news@nmix.net
X-Trace: reader.nmix.net 962169223 28836 204.134.124.52 (28 Jun 2000 05:13:43 GMT)
Organization: of the mind
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: the, group
NNTP-Posting-Date: 28 Jun 2000 05:13:43 GMT
Newsgroups: co.denver.general,co.general