🚀 go-pugleaf

On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 12:36:08 -0700, chatnoir <wolfbat359a@mindspring.com>  
wrote:

> On Jan 8, 10:07 am, drylined <r...@d.mr> wrote:
>> On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 17:59:44 -0700, chatnoir  
>> <wolfbat3...@mindspring.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Jan 7, 3:54 pm, drylined <r...@d.mr> wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 18:56:09 -0700, chatnoir
>> >> <wolfbat3...@mindspring.com>
>> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> > On Jan 6, 9:52 am, drylined <r...@d.mr> wrote:
>> >> >> On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 22:32:05 -0700, chatnoir
>> >> >> <wolfbat3...@mindspring.com>
>> >> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> > Which means the Platte Pipeline system is connected to Canada  
>> and
>> >> the
>> >> >> > Oil-Tar Sands!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>
>> >> >> Yes it is, and so what? Would you prefer it to bring it Saudi oil?
>>
>> >> >> Does it bother you that Canada wants to create jobs in the US to
>> >> build
>> >> >> another pipeline (XL) to send their tar sands oil to US  
>> refineries in
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> Gulf?
>>
>> >> > Looks like you lose out!  An expert on the pipeline says it should  
>> not
>> >> > be built!:
>>
>> >> >http://www.democracynow.org/2012/1/6/headlines#13
>>
>> >> > Ex-Inspector Urges Cancellation of Keystone XL Pipeline      A  
>> former
>> >> > inspector on the original Keystone pipeline is sounding the alarm  
>> over
>> >> > TransCanada’s plans for the Keystone XL. Mike Klink, a former  
>> Bechtel
>> >> > employee who surveyed the first Keystone pipeline, says he raised
>> >> > numerous concerns during construction that went ignored. The first
>> >> > Keystone carries tar sands oil from Alberta to refineries in the
>> >> > Midwest, while the XL would extend that route to the Gulf Coast.
>> >> > Writing in Nebraska’s Lincoln Journal Star, Klink describes a  
>> number
>> >> > of safety and design flaws, including cheap foreign steel, weak
>> >> > foundations and rigged safety tests.
>>
>> >> So it has had how many failures? One in North Dakota due to a bad  
>> valve?
>>
>> >> > He concludes: "I am coming
>> >> > forward because my kids encouraged me to tell the truth about what  
>> was
>> >> > done and covered up... I am not telling you we shouldn’t build
>> >> > pipelines. We just should not build this one."
>>
>> >> There is no reason to believe that "this one" would be identical to  
>> the
>> >> "last one".
>>
>> >> Especially as he did speak out.
>>
>> >> Sigh...
>>
>> > I will stand behind the expert rather than your childish rants - what
>> > are you 8 or 9 years old?
>>
>> You will do as your Lib masters tell you to do - what don't you trust  
>> our
>> government to do proper inspections and set standards to make this a  
>> safe
>> pipeline?
>>
>> And thanks again for chasing good paying jobs away from hard working
>> Americans.
>>
>
> Nope, there are just some areas too important to soil!
>
> Such as!:
>
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/jan/09/obama-protect-grand-canyon-uranium-mining
>
> headline:
>
> Obama holds strong to protect Grand Canyon

Subject change.

Adieu, puppet

--- Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net/ - Complaints to news@netfront.net ---