🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <pDmAd.1688993$SM5.135099@news.easynews.com>,
Sam Stone  <sirian@mental.org> wrote:
>Daniel Packman wrote:

 
>>>That unseats the pseudo scientists who'd grab the eco-high ground and 
>>>claim fossil fuels to be the root of all warming.
 
>> The numbers now are pretty clear.

>Lol!

>Oh are they???

The results summarized are from the EPA and backed by actual
research and actual numbers. Do you have *specific* reasons
to question these results? Have you done some calculations
that the research community should be aware of?

>> "most of the warming is over the last 50 years is attributable to
>> human activites."
>> http://yosemite.epa.gov/oar/globalwarming.nsf/content/climate.html

>Funny there is no mention in the increased frequency of undersea 
>volcanism and its impact on the global conveyor...

So, what measurements are you using to characterize this over
time? Have you calculated the energy budget of this mechanism?

>Funny there is all this attention paid to fossil fuels and not the 
>slightest mention of that massive microwave transmitter in the northern 
>attitudes known as HAARP.  ......

So, what measurements are you using to characterize this over
time? Have you calculated the energy budget of this mechanism?

.....
>Sorry, we've been down this path before and I suspect that despite any 
>emissions we may have accelerated that the macro results we see today 
>are largely pushed by natural phenomena and to an extent response to our 
>presence. .....

Thank you for your input.
Your detailed research in this area will be given due weight.

-- 
Daniel Packman
NCAR/ACD
pack@ucar.edu