🚀 go-pugleaf

It is a scientific fact that, before the beginning of ancient and modern
human history, most of the world was covered in gigantic sheets of ice. That
lends scientific/historical credence to, but does not necessarily prove, a
global flood as described in the Bible, which also may just be a local flood
(instead of translating the passages "covering all the earth," it may be
valid to translate them as "covering all the land in the area").

Finally, I think macro-evolution theories have all been
scientifically/historically disproven. The fossil record doesn't support
them, among other evidence. "Micro-Evolution," or change of genes within
species, is possible, however, as the breeding of dogs and the Bible itself
attest.

ts

www.answers.org

www.movieguide.org

"Sam Stone" <sirian@mental.org> wrote in message
news:1QiBd.7797887$6p.1225180@news.easynews.com...
> Daniel Packman wrote:
> > In article <8UMAd.7711429$6p.1212943@news.easynews.com>,
> > Sam Stone  <sirian@mental.org> wrote:
> > ......
> >
> >>http://www.clarifyingchristianity.com/science.shtml
> >>
> >>Statements Consistent With Physics .....
> >
> >
> > Consisten with is not the same as physics itself.
>
> Yes I know, we've got that anal scientists narrow style to leap over...
>
> > These "predictions" of nuclear processes and television
> > are so vague that they could be just about anything.
>
> Bet you detest Nostradamus too.
>
> > The reference to the Greenland Ice sheet all but
> > proves the lack of a global flood. Your followup
> > of global flooding coincident with global warming
> > is a prediction of widespread flooding, not a planetary
> > inundation.
>
> Yes, that's a more accurate appraisal. I'm not promoting the idea that
> every single acre was simultaneously underwater.
>
> In like manner the recent tsunami caused a robust 8' sea level increase
> in the Gulf.
>
> > Periodic floods throughout the world are well
> > known. A planetary flood is contrary to physical evidence
> > and required by biblical literalists.
>
> A planetary flood need not cover every inch of landmass, merely those
> areas of human habitation and lifestyle at the time it was recorded.
>
>