🚀 go-pugleaf

Daniel Packman wrote:
> In article <NT6Ad.5483617$yk.832486@news.easynews.com>,
> Sam Stone  <sirian@mental.org> wrote:
> 
>>Daniel Packman wrote:
> 
> 
> ..... 
> 
>>>I wouldn't put it as a yes/no successful/unsuccessful problem.
>>>That denies the value in modeling that gets better each year.
> 
> 
>>That unseats the pseudo scientists who'd grab the eco-high ground and 
>>claim fossil fuels to be the root of all warming.
> 
> 
> The numbers now are pretty clear.

Lol!

Oh are they???

> "most of the warming is over the last 50 years is attributable to
> human activites."
> http://yosemite.epa.gov/oar/globalwarming.nsf/content/climate.html

Funny there is no mention in the increased frequency of undersea 
volcanism and its impact on the global conveyor...

Funny there is all this attention paid to fossil fuels and not the 
slightest mention of that massive microwave transmitter in the northern 
attitudes known as HAARP.

Why they report now that there's a false dawn through much of the polar 
winter day due to a new pervasive inversion reflecting light from more 
southerly latitudes. That's a new one. Ever look at what HAARP's up to - 
lot of RF going out up north.

Funny to choose a period of say 50 years and be so certain that other 
factors like volcanism and alterations in the lungs of the planet (rain 
forests) aren't prime contributors.

Sorry, we've been down this path before and I suspect that despite any 
emissions we may have accelerated that the macro results we see today 
are largely pushed by natural phenomena and to an extent response to our 
presence.

Always remember global warming = global cooling - every time.