🚀 go-pugleaf

Bill Lev
> The Lone Weasel wrote: 
>> Bill Levi
>>>The Lone Weasel wrote:
>>>>Bill Levinso
>> 
>> 
>>>>>I support the right of gays to OWN firearms 
>>>>
>>>>Who doesn't, Shitorian?
>>>
>>>You don't, if they are not in the Armed Forces or National
>>>Guard. 
>> 
>> I've always said personal gun rights are provided by the 
>> states; looks like gunlobby hysteria makes a fool of you
>> once again.
> 
> So you are saying that people have rights because they are
> provided by the State, 

Federal and state constitutions and statutes.  That's right.

> not because they are inherent and
> natural human rights? I though as much; you are a Statist
> (a family that includes Fascists, Nazis, Socialists, and
> Communists). 

So, when it came to supporting the Vietnam War you were a big 
statist, but when it came to actually serving in the war you 
advocated, you became a conservative elitist like Limbaugh, 
using minor visual impairment as an excuse to shirk your duty 
while others with the same visual impairment wore glasses and 
served honorably.

So you're basically an amoral snot-nosed hypocrite willing to 
say anything to promote a corrupt agenda.  

>>>>>even if they
>>>>>are not in the Armed Forces, you gay-bashing Fascist.
>>>>
>>>>But the question now is - do you support the right of
>>>>gays to serve in the National Guard, which would provide
>>>>them with a true Second Amendment rkba when on active
>>>>duty? 
>>>
>>>You are changing the subject again. 
>>
>> I'm asking if you give a damn about gay rights apart from 
>> selling them more new guns.  You're afraid to answer that 
>> question because you don't really care about natural
>> rights or human rights or constitutional or civil rights,
>> you're just here to sell more new guns.
> 
> Do you or do you not believe that people, gays included,
> have a RIGHT to own firearms even if they are not in the
> Armed Forces or National Guard? 

You can't say that gays have a right to serve in the military 
openly and get married like straight couples, because that 
would displease your Republican Party overlords, and you 
can't say anything that would bug your elitist overseers, eh 
Shitorian?

Do you refuse to answer as a chickenhawk statist or as a 
conservative elitist gunwhore?

Laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh.

______________


Quotiens dubia interpretatio libertatis est, secundum 
libertatem respondendum erit. Whenever there is a doubt 
between liberty and slavery, the decision must be in favor 
of liberty. Dig. 50, 17, 20.


-- 

Yours truly,

The Lone Weasel