🚀 go-pugleaf

The Lone Weasel wrote:

> "Sir Marksman" <0@0.com> wrote in
> news:4t%yd.92945$AL5.16389@twister.nyroc.rr.com: 
> 
> 
>>"The Lone Fascist" <loneweaselNO@SPAMyahoo.com> whined and
>>evaded in message 
>>news:Xns95C996977F999loneweaselyahooco@130.133.1.4... 
>>
>>>Bill Lev
>>>
>>>>The Lone Weasel wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Bill Levi
>>>>>
>>>>>>The Lone Weasel wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Bill Levinso
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I support the right of gays to OWN firearms
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Who doesn't, Shitorian?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You don't, if they are not in the Armed Forces or
>>>>>>National Guard.
>>>>>
>>>>>I've always said personal gun rights are provided by the
>>>>>states; looks like gunlobby hysteria makes a fool of you
>>>>>once again.
>>>>
>>>>So you are saying that people have rights because they
>>>>are provided by the State,
>>>
>>>Federal and state constitutions and statutes.  That's
>>>right. 
>>>
>>>
>>>>not because they are inherent and
>>>>natural human rights? I though as much; you are a Statist
>>>>(a family that includes Fascists, Nazis, Socialists, and
>>>>Communists).
>>>
>>>So, when it came to supporting the Vietnam War you were a
>>>big statist, but when it came to actually serving in the
>>>war you advocated, you became a conservative elitist like
>>>Limbaugh, using minor visual impairment as an excuse to
>>>shirk your duty while others with the same visual
>>>impairment wore glasses and served honorably.
>>>
>>>So you're basically an amoral snot-nosed hypocrite willing
>>>to say anything to promote a corrupt agenda.
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>>>even if they
>>>>>>>>are not in the Armed Forces, you gay-bashing Fascist.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>But the question now is - do you support the right of
>>>>>>>gays to serve in the National Guard, which would
>>>>>>>provide them with a true Second Amendment rkba when on
>>>>>>>active duty?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You are changing the subject again.
>>>>>
>>>>>I'm asking if you give a damn about gay rights apart
>>>>>from selling them more new guns.  You're afraid to
>>>>>answer that question because you don't really care about
>>>>>natural rights or human rights or constitutional or
>>>>>civil rights, you're just here to sell more new guns.
>>>>
>>>>Do you or do you not believe that people, gays included,
>>>>have a RIGHT to own firearms even if they are not in the
>>>>Armed Forces or National Guard?
>>>
>>>You can't say that gays have a right to serve in the
>>>military openly and get married like straight couples,
>>>because that would displease your Republican Party
>>>overlords, and you can't say anything that would bug your
>>>elitist overseers, eh Shitorian?
>>
>>So again you evade and refuse to answer directly. How
>>typical of you elitist LIEberals.
> 
> 
> Simple question: do you support the right of gays & lesbians 
> to serve openly in the Armed Forces, including the National 
> Guard, or do you not?

The Bill of Rights says nothing about a right to serve in the Armed 
Forces. It says plenty about the right to keep and bear arms. Quit 
squirming and evading, Weasel. Well, that is what weasels do, isn't it-- 
squirm and evade???

> And while we're on it, do you support the "natural human 
> right" of gays and lesbians to marry?

Sort of like the man in "Life of Brian" who wanted the RIGHT to have 
children, even though he was obviously incapable of doing so???