🚀 go-pugleaf

> Um Dennis - read a bit more closely - Erich is the one snipping
context, eliminating links,
> and generally accusing me of any and every thing he can come up with.

No Chris you are the liar here...lying through your teeth!  Why can't
you tell the truth?  What are you hiding?  I think you are hiding the
fact that you are a big empty headed loser in life, trying desperatly to
get people to go for your stupid idea that Bush is better than Gore.
And the main reason you like Bush is because he's stupid like you, so
you can understand what he is saying.

>
> I don't know what objectivity means to you, but surf this thread for a
while and you'll see
> that while there may be political divergence between us - even hearty
argument - I don't
> edit  to victory.

See you can't even make any damn sense.  Your entire arguments are made
up of name calling, bullshit accusations and things that kind of sound
good but don't make a damn bit of sense.  I think you need to take some
drugs.  It might help.

>
> He tries.
>
> Been there before.
>
> Seen that too many damn times.
>
> > [snip]
> > :> Sadly, disinformation is very easy to spread on
> > :> the 'net.
> >
> > : True...http://www.hereliesalgore.com/ is a far better compendium
of actual media links.
> > [snip]
> > :> Just pathetic that this SPAMmer thinks that we are all stupid and
un-
> > :> informed.
> >
> > : Well apparently you hadn't done much research into the subject.
Simply calling it
> > : "disinformation" is inaccurate and dismissive.
> >
> >   Partial truths are the worst kind of lie, they are the hardest to
refute
> > because you have to pick the pieces apart.  When information that is
mis-
> > leading comes out tainting another individual as a liar, it seems
somewhat
> > hypocritical to me.  It is quite true that some information looks
false or
> > true based on points of view and isn't totally absolute. However,
that goes
> > both ways.  Most of what I saw from that site simply leans the way
that is
> > most damning to Gore.  It is not impartial and it does not examine
the
> > background in such a way as to let the reader decide which is more
"untrue".
> > However, we are human and it would take a super human to be truely
impartial.
> >
>
> Sorry, a course in moral relativism is not prudent in defense of some
perceived claim to
> objectivity. That's another feint.
>
> Fact is the liberal media, even in their excessive hubris, have been
forced to catalog some
> of the VP's excesses.
>
> These aren't philosophical middle ground parries - they're documented
lies.
>
> > Regardless, before I am labeled a "Gore supporter" (as if that was a
horrific
> > insult)
>
> It's darn sure nothing to be proud of.
>
> > I have to say I don't like ANY of the major or minor candidates this
> > time around.
>
> I'm not all that thrilled myself, but I'll sort out the noxious weeds
on my ballot.
>
> >  So, I'm concentrating on sorting out my local candidates where
> > I can make the most of my vote.
>
> Ignore the big ones and increased federalism may make the rest
irrelevant.
>
> > IMO, YMMV,
> > DLC
> > --
> >
========================================================================
====
> > * Dennis Clark  Aristocrat at heart  dlc@verinet.com
www.verinet.com/~dlc *
> > * Be well, do good work, and stay in touch -- Garrison Keillor
       *
> >
========================================================================
====
>
> If you heard this week's "PHC" the candidate interview was killer
funny - and non partisan...
>
>


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.