Article View: co.general
Article #86262Re: Broncos Stadium Facts
From: Scott Ledbetter
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 1998 00:00
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 1998 00:00
25 lines
1635 bytes
1635 bytes
As I pointed out before, Bowlen, Webb and Romer have ALL come out in opposition to a dome. The dome is dead. Period. As I pointed out before, when you have no reasonable response, you resort to name calling. As an opponent of the $500 million corporate welfare sweepstakes, I am ecstatic to have you on the other side. People will go back through Deja News and figure out your modus operandi within minutes. Even if you have something reasonable to say, it will be dismissed. Thank You! Chris wrote: > Scott Ledbetter wrote: > > > Umm, I guess you haven't heard the news: there is no dome in the > > plans. I repeat, there > > will be no dome. No dome. No dome. No dome. No Super Bowl. No Super > > Bowl. > > No Super Bowl. Got it? > > No idiot, I haven't got it. Study the bill. Until the Senate comes to a > conclusion, it is up for grabs.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<352D1F3F.10C564C@sweng.stortek.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<6ggqg8$7dh@bgtnsc03.worldnet.att.net> <352BFEC4.40E5F238@sweng.stortek.com> <6ghk12$o6i@bgtnsc03.worldnet.att.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1073ca,2623d422d133a196 X-Google-Attributes: gid1073ca,public X-Google-Thread: 1026d8,2623d422d133a196 X-Google-Attributes: gid1026d8,public From: Scott Ledbetter <scottl@sweng.stortek.com> Subject: Re: Broncos Stadium Facts Date: 1998/04/09 Message-ID: <352D1F3F.10C564C@sweng.stortek.com> X-Deja-AN: 342504777 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <6ggqg8$7dh@bgtnsc03.worldnet.att.net> <352BFEC4.40E5F238@sweng.stortek.com> <6ghk12$o6i@bgtnsc03.worldnet.att.net> To: Chris <me@my.hometown> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Storage Technology Corporation Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: scottl@sweng.stortek.com Newsgroups: co.general,co.politics