🚀 go-pugleaf

Me (none@urbusiness.com) wrote:

Chicken.

: I don't post my name precisely because nuts are
: running around with concealed weapons.  Do as you
: feel best, but I aien't gonna' get my butt blown off
: by some Nutzie on Usenet.  

Those of us who are arguing for shall-issue legislation are using our
names and showing our faces and explaining our views.

Meantime, the opposition is making up lies attributing motives they
conjure up and never reviewing the facts and hiding in anonymity.

Who ought to be listened to?

Mr. Anonymous - the shall-issue legislation calls for a background check.
Those of us willing to go thru the process are folks who aren't going
to suddenly go crazy and blow people away.  The facts support this.

And the reason we are concerned is that as a society we CAN do better
but are NOT!  The judges and "the system" are letting the violent
predators back out rather quickly. If the system won't protect us
from the re-released, then we have to do it ourselves. 

I'm 40 years old. I'm not about to start a life of crime now. It's been
two decades since my speeding ticket - I'm not about to blow it now!

Ron Miller
Ft. Collins

PS- Bob L. isn't crazy either