🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <8e55n6$8po$1@ncar.ucar.edu>,
  pack at ucar dot edu wrote:
> In article <8e4vuc$v0o$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
> Salvador Astucia  <adolf_goldberg@my-deja.com>
wrote:
>
> [...re: Holocaust denier Irving vs Lipstadt..]
>
> >The following URL provides details:
> >
>
>http://www.fpp.co.uk/Legal/Penguin/PenguinIndex.h
tml
> >
> >Irving recently lost the suit, but says he
will appeal....
>
> He *lost*, yet the news media has given it
short shrift. If this
> is some sort of plot against him, it is very
obscure indeed.

It's not a plot against David Irving.  It's more
like damage control for organized Jewry now that
David Irving has taken them on.  The judge's
ruling matters little, for the truth has a way of
penetrating walls of oppression; no matter how
powerful they may seem.  -- Salvador

> You might want to spend some time in the
reference material
> you even quote, particularly the findings of
fact at
>
>
http://www.fpp.co.uk/docs/trial/closing/Rampton.ht
ml
>
> where is detailed Irvings' "falsification of
history on
> a massive scale".
>
> Your cites of patently false and antisemitic
trash hardly
> puts you in a position of impartial judge.
>
>



Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.