Re: MCI E-mail Snooping

Article View: comp.admin.policy

Article #121

#121

From: Joe Trott
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 16:20

15 lines
1009 bytes

morgan@ms.uky.edu (Wes Morgan) writes:

>>Question:  did the staff worker have the RIGHT to read Wang's email?

>>I don't have time to read user's files or email that is still in queue.

>I follow the same pattern......I don't have time to snoop either.

It isn't a question of whether you have the _time_; the question is, do you
have the _right_?

Unless it's in the contract, how can the answer be anything but "NO!"?
Why would it be in the contract?  Who would sign such a contract?

-JTT

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Sep11.162036.3932@dcatlas.dot.gov>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dcatlas!joet

References: <1992Sep9.121142.4840@ms.uky.edu> <1992Sep9.231718.1863@PacBell.COM> <1992Sep10.170535.1335@ms.uky.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.admin.policy,alt.comp.acad-freedom.talk,misc.legal.computing
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dcatlas!joet
From: joet@dcatlas.dot.gov (Joe Trott)
Subject: Re: MCI E-mail Snooping
Message-ID: <1992Sep11.162036.3932@dcatlas.dot.gov>
Keywords: Corporate Computing, September 1992
Organization: U.S Dept. of Transportation
References: <1992Sep9.121142.4840@ms.uky.edu>      <1992Sep9.231718.1863@PacBell.COM> <1992Sep10.170535.1335@ms.uky.edu>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 16:20:36 GMT
Lines: 16

Reply to Parent Message