Article View: comp.admin.policy
Article #145Re: Banned Computer Material 1992
From: mike begley
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1992 02:49
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1992 02:49
50 lines
3113 bytes
3113 bytes
In article <1992Sep30.182912.29524@mtek.com> bud@mtek.com writes: >kadie@eff.org (Carl M. Kadie) writes: > >>Banned Computer Material 1992 > >>Inspired by Banned Book Week '92, this is a list of computer material >>banned or challenged in academia in 1992. Iowa State University has >>the dubious distinction of being listed most often (three times). > >Ummm, the word "dubious" would seem to suggest that the enforcement >of *any* local restriction against *any* action or speech in *any* >academic computing environment, world-wide, is in violation of some >"universal principle" that supercedes any locally-conceived ideas >about how the owners wish to dispose the assets they are paying for. it's a dubious honor, trust me... Iowa State University has been caught in a battle between its administration and its student for most of a year regarding this issue. The materials banned at ISU (alt.sex*, rec.arts.erotica, and a few others) in no way violate the Iowa Code (see section 728) and the restrictions were placed on the system by the ISU computation Center administration with no input from students and little if any from higher administration. A "senior official" personally told me that "the [ISU] computation center administration had no business in making legal decisions because they have no legal expertise". The university administration is now caught in a curious bind; defend the irresponsible actions one of it departments, or uphold the tenants of academic freedom. In some ways it's become a turf war within the administration, with the students as victims. So, despite the overwhelming student & faculty opposition to the restrictions and the total lack of informed legal judgement, the university continues to censor the "bad" newsgroup from students who are quite old enough to make their own decisions. >which device typically sets academics to howling wildly at the >moon -- but perhaps only when aimed at their *own* several and >peculiar sensibilities. huh...funny, I don't even read any of the newsgroups...so it wasn't aimed at any of my peciliar sensibilities. Considering the state motto of Iowa is "Our liberties we prize and our rights we shall maintain", you would think that insuring freedom of expression would be a basic goal of the state's universities; alas, they've srunk from that duty. -- Michael Begley Ask me how "the man and the woman were spam@iastate.edu Iowa State University both naked, and they were (515) 296-8378 is censoring my usenet access not ashamed..." Gen:2.25
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct1.024913.14347@news.iastate.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wupost!gumby!destroyer!news.iastate.edu!spamReferences:
<1992Sep30.065537.23479@eff.org> <1992Sep30.182912.29524@mtek.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.admin.policy Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wupost!gumby!destroyer!news.iastate.edu!spam From: spam@iastate.edu (mike begley) Subject: Re: Banned Computer Material 1992 Message-ID: <1992Oct1.024913.14347@news.iastate.edu> Sender: news@news.iastate.edu (USENET News System) Organization: Iowa State University, Ames, IA References: <1992Sep30.065537.23479@eff.org> <1992Sep30.182912.29524@mtek.com> Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 02:49:13 GMT Lines: 50