🚀 go-pugleaf

bud@mtek.com (Bud Hovell) writes:

[...]
>By pronouncing summary judgement, you thereby attempt to finesse an
>appearance that debate has already *concluded* in favor of your own
>pet notions.
>
>It doesn't wash.
[...]

I confess that an implicit premise of the List is that academic
censorship of computer media is generally wrong. I'm sorry if this was
unclear. Now that you have "caught" me, you are welcome to argue
against this premise. A good forum for this continuing debate might be
alt.comp.acad-freedom.talk (or the corresponding mailing list).

- Carl

ANNOTATED REFERENCES

(All these documents are available on-line. Access information follows.)

=================
caf
=================
A description to the comp-academic-freedom-talk mailing list. It is a
free-forum for the discussion of questions such as: How should general
principles of academic freedom (such as freedom of expression, freedom
to read, due process, and privacy) be applied to university computers
and networks? How are these principles actually being applied? How can
the principles of academic freedom as applied to computers and
networks be defended?

=================
=================

These document(s) are available by anonymous ftp (the preferred
method) and by email. To get the file(s) via ftp, do an anonymous ftp
to ftp.eff.org (192.88.144.4), and get file(s):

  pub/academic/caf

To get the file(s) by email, send email to archive-server@eff.org.
Include the line(s) (be sure to include the space before the file
name):

send acad-freedom caf


--
Carl Kadie -- kadie@cs.uiuc.edu -- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign