Article View: comp.admin.policy
Article #219Re: Banned List Reminds me of National Enquirer Tactics!
From: Randy Marchany
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 1992 19:26
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 1992 19:26
50 lines
2851 bytes
2851 bytes
In article <1992Oct5.172525.17375@m.cs.uiuc.edu> kadie@herodotus.cs.uiuc.edu (Carl M. Kadie) writes: >Randy, > >I'm sorry the original version of the Banned List didn't mention that >the Virginia Tech policy was being revised. I based the list mostly on >the CAF-News abstracts, I forgot about your email message to me last >April. The current version of the List (the version included in new >CAF-News) notes that the Virgina Tech policy is currently being >revised. > >- Carl > Carl, thank you for the apology but I'm still perturbed over the intent of posting a "Sites that BAN stuff" list. Certainly, other sites as well as our own are in the process of adopting and revising acceptable use policies but your original post served no real purpose other than to misrepresent the entire issue of "what is acceptable use" at a site. All you have to do is check out the spinoffs from your original thread in order to see how far we've drifted away from the issue. I do appreciate the fact that the new version of your post states that our policy is under revision. As I mentioned in previous posts, you've created the scenario where the revised 'list' is similar to a a retraction that appears in the back pages of the newspaper. Technically, you have corrected an error but in reality, the majority of readers will only remember the original message. Carl, the thing that I really don't understand is that you published a 'List' without contacting the named institutions IN ADVANCE. The failure to do this indicates 1) you didn't verify the accuracy of your information. You had contact names since most of these sites submitted policy statements to you for review. 2) you failed to give the named institutions due process by not giving them an opportunity to verify the information you were planning to publicize. I do object to the creation of any such 'list' in this form. Handled improperly (as I feel was done in this case), such a list creates an atmosphere of suspicion toward the named entities. I hate to use the term, "McCarthyism" but that's what this whole affair smacks of. Enlightening the Usenet community via a "list" is noble but make sure your information is accurate and that you've contacted the affected parties beforehand. -Randy Marchany VA Tech Computing Center Blacksburg, VA 24060 INTERNET: marchany@vtserf.cc.vt.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7863@vtserf.cc.vt.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!vtserf!marchanyReferences:
<7757@vtserf.cc.vt.edu> <1992Oct5.172525.17375@m.cs.uiuc.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!vtserf!marchany From: marchany@vtserf.cc.vt.edu (Randy Marchany) Newsgroups: comp.admin.policy,alt.comp.acad-freedom.talk Subject: Re: Banned List Reminds me of National Enquirer Tactics! Message-ID: <7863@vtserf.cc.vt.edu> Date: 6 Oct 92 19:26:45 GMT References: <7757@vtserf.cc.vt.edu> <1992Oct5.172525.17375@m.cs.uiuc.edu> Followup-To: comp.admin.policy Organization: Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA Lines: 51