Article View: comp.admin.policy
Article #37Re: MUDS: Network menace, or just another service?
From: Christopher Davis
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 1992 03:47
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 1992 03:47
40 lines
2715 bytes
2715 bytes
shane> == shane alan johns <sjohns@mango.ucs.indiana.edu> shane> What I would like to know is whether or not MUDs actually are shane> forbidden by Internet. If they ARE, then whether or not a shane> sys.admin believes it is educational is irrelevant! What does shane> Internet have to say on the issue of MUDs? Is it an improper shane> use of Internet? Rule #1: The Internet is an extremely diverse network of networks. Corollary: The only "laws" that can be applied to the entire Internet are on the order of laws of nature, like "Follow the TCP/IP specs or you won't be able to talk to anyone." There could, certainly, be parts of the Internet that MUDs are forbidden within; I can think of a couple university campus networks that fit the bill without really trying. There are, on the other hand, also portions of the Internet where MUDs are explicitly *not* forbidden, or are even encouraged. Certainly they are not in contravention of the "acceptable use" policies, such as they are, of the commercial IP providers. On the third hand (hey, Zaphod Beeblebrox here), there are parts of the network that may or may not prohibit MUDs, but haven't explicitly decided one way or the other (like the NSFNET backbone). The educational value of a MUD is of importance in this case, since the NSFNET acceptable use policy states that the network is for use in support of research & education. My personal feeling is that if it gets people who would otherwise never touch a computer to start using them (I know people who wouldn't have done anything more than word processing who learned how to use Unix just to compile IRC clients), it's educational. Of course, I don't run the NSFNET, so I wouldn't count on that interpretation holding. -- Christopher Davis <ckd@eff.org> | ECONOMIC OBSERVATIONS DEPARTMENT System Manager & Postmaster | "There's always something going out of Electronic Frontier Foundation | business in Central Square." +1 617 864 0665 NIC: [CKD1] | -Rita Marie Rouvalis <rita@eff.org>
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<CKD.92Mar31224603@loiosh.eff.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!pacbell.com!iggy.GW.Vitalink.COM!widener!eff!ckdReferences:
<jim.701571450@ferkel> <1992Mar31.194230.26631@news.cs.indiana.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.admin.policy,rec.games.mud Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!pacbell.com!iggy.GW.Vitalink.COM!widener!eff!ckd From: ckd@eff.org (Christopher Davis) Subject: Re: MUDS: Network menace, or just another service? In-Reply-To: shane alan johns's message of Tue, 31 Mar 1992 19:42:24 -0500 Message-ID: <CKD.92Mar31224603@loiosh.eff.org> Sender: usenet@eff.org (NNTP News Poster) Nntp-Posting-Host: loiosh.eff.org Organization: Electronic Frontier Foundation Tech Central References: <jim.701571450@ferkel> <1992Mar31.194230.26631@news.cs.indiana.edu> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 1992 03:47:16 GMT Lines: 40