Article View: comp.admin.policy
Article #434Re: E-mail Privacy
From: Phil Ngai
Date: Thu, 30 May 1991 20:37
Date: Thu, 30 May 1991 20:37
10 lines
972 bytes
972 bytes
None of the responses to this question seem to consider the fact that the email which he was asked to retrieve was sent by the same person who wants it. If the sender had made a carbon copy, this wouldn't be necessary. But since the sender wrote the memo in the first place, is this really a violation of privacy in the sense that the sender would learn something he didn't already know? -- The media is in the business of distorting people's perception of reality, by emphasising the out of the ordinary.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1991May30.203700.25025@amd.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!lll-winken!sun-barr!newstop!sun!amdcad!brahms!philReferences:
<15110@ccncsu.ColoState.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!lll-winken!sun-barr!newstop!sun!amdcad!brahms!phil From: phil@brahms.amd.com (Phil Ngai) Newsgroups: comp.admin.policy,comp.unix.admin Subject: Re: E-mail Privacy Message-ID: <1991May30.203700.25025@amd.com> Date: 30 May 91 20:37:00 GMT References: <15110@ccncsu.ColoState.EDU> Sender: usenet@amd.com (NNTP Posting) Organization: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Lines: 10