Article View: comp.admin.policy
Article #554Re: E-mail Privacy
From: Leonard Erickson
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 1991 03:32
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 1991 03:32
39 lines
2612 bytes
2612 bytes
conca@handel.cs.colostate.edu (michael vincen conca) writes: <Aproximately 1 month ago, a certain employee was advised that he/she was <was acting in an inappropriate manner and that they needed to make <certain adjustments in their attitude. A meeting was held between the head <manager and this employee in which the above issue was discussed. All of <this was summarized in a memo which was E-mailed to the employee. <Yesterday, this employee was terminated. He/she was allowed to gather <their things and purge all of their personal files from the system. Today, <my boss asked if it would be possible to retrieve this employee's E-mail <off of backup, find the memo, and print it out in case it was needed as <evidence in a possible court case. <Now for the tough questions. < Is this legal? Is this ethical? If this person still worked <here, I would immediately refuse. But since they don't, do they still <have any rights to their E-mail? Right now, I am leaning towards refusing <because I think a person's E-mail is theirs, regardless of their status <with the organization. Anyone have any other opinions on this? You are overlooking one detail. The *sender* of the email has rights to it too. He *should* have kept a copy, but since he didn't, retreiving any messages *from* him *to* the terminated employee is perfectly legal. As is frequently pointed out on the net, the *sender* has copyright on email! I'm not a lawyer, but I'd say all you *should* need is permission of *one* of the parties to retrieve the message. Anything after that is up to the court. And at the very least, *I* would lock up that backup tape along with logs and the like to enable you to "prove" that it is indeed what you claim it to be. Remember, the lawyers on *both* sides may get interested in this, and I'd hate to have to reply to a court order with "Sorry, that tape got re-used yesterday." -- Leonard Erickson leonard@qiclab.uucp personal: CIS: [70465,203] 70465.203@compuserve.com business: CIS: [76376,1107] 76376.1107@compuserve.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1991Jun7.033200.8793@qiclab.scn.rain.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!mintaka!ogicse!qiclab!leonardReferences:
<15110@ccncsu.ColoState.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!mintaka!ogicse!qiclab!leonard From: leonard@qiclab.scn.rain.com (Leonard Erickson) Newsgroups: comp.admin.policy,comp.unix.admin Subject: Re: E-mail Privacy Message-ID: <1991Jun7.033200.8793@qiclab.scn.rain.com> Date: 7 Jun 91 03:32:00 GMT References: <15110@ccncsu.ColoState.EDU> Reply-To: 70465.203@compuserve.com Organization: SCN Research/Qic Laboratories of Tigard, Oregon. Lines: 39