Article View: comp.admin.policy
Article #667Punishment
From: Carl M. Kadie
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 1991 19:33
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 1991 19:33
30 lines
1630 bytes
1630 bytes
[I'm assuming a university setting. - Carl] Resolved: Users should not be suspended or expelled from computer systems as punishment for computer-policy infractions. [My mind is still open on this question, but for the sake of debate, I'll try to make the case.] The most common punishment for a computer-policy infraction seems to suspension or expulsion from the computer. I think think is often inappropriate and harsh. It is inappropriatate because the computer system, like the library, is not a treat for rewarding good students; rather it is an indispensable educational resource. When punishment is motivated by a desire to set an example for others or as response to an hysterical fear of so-called hackers, it is often overly harsh. Disciplinary action should respond to the indent of the student and the damage caused by the student, not outside pressures In developing responsible student conduct, disciplinary proceedings play a role substantially secondary to example, counseling, guidance, and admonition. For example, a written warning with a copy to the student's file may suffice. - Carl -- Carl Kadie -- kadie@eff.org or kadie@cs.uiuc.edu -- But I speak for myself.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1991Jun14.193333.452@eff.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!think.com!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!world!eff!kadieShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!think.com!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!world!eff!kadie From: kadie@eff.org (Carl M. Kadie) Newsgroups: comp.admin.policy Subject: Punishment Message-ID: <1991Jun14.193333.452@eff.org> Date: 14 Jun 91 19:33:33 GMT Followup-To: comp.admin.policy,alt.comp.acad-freedom.talk Organization: The Electronic Frontier Foundation Lines: 30