🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Oct21.224417.4712@wolves.uucp> news@wolves.uucp (The Wolfe of the Den) writes:
>In article <1992Oct19.175336.24090@eff.org> kadie@eff.org (Carl M. Kadie) writes:
>>================================================================
>>Let me try to summarize my position:
>>
>>The line between prohibited sexual harassment and protected expression
>>is very, very fine. Because of this, universities have set up careful
>                                     ^ some or most - certainly NOT all
>>procedures for enforcement of sexual harassment rules. No one should
>>try to enforce the rules unless they are authorized by the procedures.
>>To consider one sceniero, if a user complains to the sys admin of
>>sexual harassment via the computer, the sys admin should refer to user
>>to the sexual harassment procedure rather than trying to fix the
>>problem him or herself.
>>================================================================

>Once again, your solution is not universal or even applicable outside of
>the limited environment your involved in.

I do work for a local community college.  They just published a
pamphlet on Sexual Harrasment.

In the first paragraph - describing different things that could be
consider sexual harrasment is one sentenct that reads in part "treating
a person with condensation".

I guess that means you can't rain on their parade.   Seems it passed
the spell checker but no one really proof-read it.   

That deserves a big smile

                      ))))
                       ))))
            ::::        ))))
            ::::         ))))
                ----      )))) 
                ----      ))))
            ::::         ))))
            ::::        ))))
                       ))))
                      ))))

-- 
Bill Vermillion - bill@bilver.oau.org  bill.vermillion@oau.org
                - bill@bilver.uucp 
                - ..!{peora|ge-dab|tous|tarpit}!bilver!bill