Article View: comp.ai.genetic
Article #40Evolution vs Coevolution
From: Daniel A Ashlock
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 16:37
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 16:37
27 lines
1628 bytes
1628 bytes
A function optimizer has a global standard of fitness, the height of the function being optimized. A GA playing prisoner's dillemma has a changing fitness function based on the particular mix of player's in the algorithm. I call these two sorts of genetic algorithms evolutionary and coevolutionary. What I'd like is to see references to transformations of evolutionary problems into coevolutionary problems. If possible summarize the effects. For example: Hillis, Daniel "Co-evolving Parasites Inprove Simulated Evolution as an Optimization Procedure" Proceedings of the Second Conference on Artificial Life. Summary: Hillis observed better results when he modified a GA that located sorting networks with relatively few comparitors to have an evolving population of test sequences whoes fitness was proportional to the number of sorting networks they fooled. The fixed population of test sequences let to a 65 comparitor network for a 16-element list. The coevolutionary version found a 61 element network. It should be noted that the "best" network contains 60 comparitors and was found by a human being. Thanks in advance, Dan Danwell@IASTAET.EDU
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan24.103719@IASTATE.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gumby!destroyer!news.iastate.edu!IASTATE.EDU!danwellShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.ai.genetic Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gumby!destroyer!news.iastate.edu!IASTATE.EDU!danwell From: danwell@IASTATE.EDU (Daniel A Ashlock) Subject: Evolution vs Coevolution Message-ID: <1993Jan24.103719@IASTATE.EDU> Sender: news@news.iastate.edu (USENET News System) Reply-To: danwell@IASTATE.EDU (Daniel A Ashlock) Organization: Iowa State University Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 16:37:19 GMT Lines: 31