Re: Proposal for new group called comp.ai.planning

Article View: comp.ai

Article #8345

#8345

From: Joseph T. Warden
Date: Thu, 25 May 1989 13:09

24 lines
1148 bytes

In article <JTR.89May24103543@exsc.cs.exeter.ac.uk> jtr@cs.exeter.ac.uk (Jason Trenouth) writes:
>
>I suggest (not propose) that perhaps what is required is
>a group:
>
>	comp.ai.philosophy
>
>Then all these "Chinese Rooms" could be put aside.
>Don't flame if someone has suggested this already - I'm
>an irregular reader of the group because of the current content!
>
>JT
>--

I agree with this statement. There should be a separate group
devoted to philosophical issues. Comp.ai should (IMHO) address
general topics.

Joseph Warden
Department of Chemistry
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Troy, NY

jtwarden@mts.rpi.edu (Internet)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <5103@rpi.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!leah!rpi!pawl24.pawl.rpi.edu!jtwarden

References: <7929@zodiac.UUCP> <JTR.89May24103543@exsc.cs.exeter.ac.uk>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!leah!rpi!pawl24.pawl.rpi.edu!jtwarden
From: jtwarden@pawl.rpi.edu (Joseph T. Warden)
Newsgroups: comp.ai
Subject: Re: Proposal for new group called comp.ai.planning
Message-ID: <5103@rpi.edu>
Date: 25 May 89 13:09:17 GMT
References: <7929@zodiac.UUCP> <JTR.89May24103543@exsc.cs.exeter.ac.uk>
Sender: usenet@rpi.edu
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY
Lines: 24
Summary: Philosophy as a separate group

Reply to Parent Message