🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.ai
Article #9104

Re: SA and bit sequence optimization

#9104
From: roberto03
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 13:51
45 lines
3415 bytes
On Jul 21, 4:31 am, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 20, 2:47 am, roberto03 <robert...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello, i am trying to apply the "simulated annealing" methodology to a
> > problem where i have to determine an optimal (according to some cost
> > function) sequence of N bits, k of which are 1 and (N-k) are 0; i can
> > switch at will the 1's and the 0's between them, but the total number
> > of 1's should be kept constant, say k = N_0, chosen by the user;
>
> > now i'd like to know if anyone has applied this methodology to this
> > kind of problem where one has to optimize a bit string in some sense.
>
> > Thanks for any answer.
> > Roberto.
>
> Let me first warn that I really know little about this specific
> problem.
>
> But it does smell quite a bit like many coding problems where you are
> trying to find a bit string that matches some criterion given partial
> information.  There are lots of interesting results to do with
> probabilistic optimization of bit strings in the area of coding, but
> some of these results depend on careful construction of the code.
> There are also related sorts of issues in Ising systems.

this could be a quite good way to solve the problem
may you point me to some good reference about it ?
thanks in advance

>
> Mackay discusses these in his book.
>
> In general, the problem that you have with these systems is that the
> set of bit strings that you want is not nicely connected.  Yes, all
> strings with a constant number of bits can be derived from all the
> other ones by simple operations like repeated transpositions, but the
> distance between strings can be pretty long.  This means that it might
> be preferable to optimize over all strings with an added penalty for
> having the wrong number of bits.  This is essentially the same as
> using a Laplace multiplier in that the optimum is not changed while
> the search space is expanded nicely.  Once you do this, SA becomes a
> very attractive option for the optimization itself.
>

[ comp.ai is moderated ... your article may take a while to appear. ]
Technical Details
Message-ID: <46a20f4b$1@news.unimelb.edu.au>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news1.optus.net.au!optus!news.optus.net.au!53ab2750!not-for-mail
References: <46a084a1$1@news.unimelb.edu.au><46a1701b$1@news.unimelb.edu.au>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10461e,ca2096b8c13d827e
X-Google-Thread: 109d8a,ca2096b8c13d827e
X-Google-Thread: f8362,ca2096b8c13d827e
X-Google-Thread: 10e2ff,ca2096b8c13d827e
X-Google-Attributes: gid10461e,gid109d8a,gidf8362,gid10e2ff,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news1.optus.net.au!optus!news.optus.net.au!53ab2750!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.ai,sci.math,comp.theory,bionet.biology.computational
Approved: ai@cs.mu.oz.au (Moderator comp.ai)
From: roberto03 <roberto03@gmail.com>
X-No-Markup: yes
Subject: Re: SA and bit sequence optimization
X-Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 08:58:09 -0000
Organization: ?
References: <46a084a1$1@news.unimelb.edu.au><46a1701b$1@news.unimelb.edu.au>
X-Mod: ?
User-Agent: nn/6.6.4
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: mulga.csse.unimelb.edu.au
Message-ID: <46a20f4b$1@news.unimelb.edu.au>
X-Original-Trace: 21 Jul 2007 23:51:07 +1100, mulga.csse.unimelb.edu.au
Lines: 45
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 13:51:09 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.250.20.3
X-Trace: news.optus.net.au 1185025869 128.250.20.3 (Sat, 21 Jul 2007 23:51:09 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 23:51:09 EST
X-Original-Bytes: 3041