Article View: comp.ai
Article #8680Re: The Chinese Room and the Babylonian Bureaucracy
From: Lord Snooty The Giant Poisoned E...
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 1990 22:46
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 1990 22:46
8 lines
866 bytes
866 bytes
How can Searle assert that syntax in and of itself cannot give rise to semantics? An existence proof for the contradiction is there for all to see in (at least) every mentally normal human child. Isn't it really this simple? -- ........................................................................... Andrew Palfreyman andrew@dtg.nsc.com Albania before April!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<139@daedalus.nsc.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!apple!voder!dtg.nsc.com!andrewReferences:
<1990Jan9.060511.9121@mentor.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!apple!voder!dtg.nsc.com!andrew From: andrew@dtg.nsc.com (Lord Snooty @ The Giant Poisoned Electric Head ) Newsgroups: comp.ai Subject: Re: The Chinese Room and the Babylonian Bureaucracy Summary: syntax => semantics Message-ID: <139@daedalus.nsc.com> Date: 9 Jan 90 22:46:51 GMT References: <1990Jan9.060511.9121@mentor.com> Organization: National Semiconductor, Santa Clara Lines: 8