Article View: comp.ai
Article #8474Re: Can humans "understand" mathematics
From: Peter Ladkin
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 1989 16:59
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 1989 16:59
9 lines
918 bytes
918 bytes
In article <130200002@peg>, ggast@peg writes: > I agree entirely that Searle is missing something.Everyone who has > learnt a foreign language will know immediately what I mean. i'm quite sure that searle is aware of most of these obvious points, and has answered them. it seems appropriate, before deciding what potential weaknesses his arguments have, to ask him about them. peter ladkin
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<20778@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!rex!ames!pasteur!ladkin@icsibReferences:
<3120@uceng.uc.edu> <130200002@peg>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!rex!ames!pasteur!ladkin@icsib From: ladkin@icsib (Peter Ladkin) Newsgroups: comp.ai Subject: Re: Can humans "understand" mathematics Message-ID: <20778@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> Date: 17 Dec 89 16:59:46 GMT References: <3120@uceng.uc.edu> <130200002@peg> Sender: news@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU Reply-To: ladkin@icsib (Peter Ladkin) Organization: International Computer Science Institute Lines: 9 In-reply-to: ggast@peg.UUCP